학술논문

The spatial contrast sensitivity function and its neurophysiological bases.
Document Type
Academic Journal
Author
Zemon V; Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Yeshiva University, 1165 Morris Park Ave., Bronx, NY 10461, USA; Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, 140 Old Orangeburg Rd., Orangeburg, NY 10962, USA. Electronic address: vepman@aol.com.; Butler PD; Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, 140 Old Orangeburg Rd., Orangeburg, NY 10962, USA; Department of Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, One Park Ave, New York, NY 10016, USA. Electronic address: pam.butler@nki.rfmh.org.; Legatt ME; Resilient Grid, 7000 Mopac Expy, Suite #200, Austin, TX 78731. Electronic address: legatt@resilientgrid.com.; Gordon J; Department of Psychology, Hunter College, City University of New York, 695 Park Ave., New York, NY 10065, USA. Electronic address: jgordon@hunter.cuny.edu.
Source
Publisher: Elsevier Science Ltd Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 0417402 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1878-5646 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00426989 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Vision Res Subsets: MEDLINE
Subject
Language
English
Abstract
Contrast processing is a fundamental function of the visual system, and contrast sensitivity as a function of spatial frequency (CSF) provides critical information about the integrity of the system. Here, we used a novel iPad-based instrument to collect CSFs and fitted the data with a difference of Gaussians model to investigate the neurophysiological bases of the spatial CSF. The reliability of repeat testing within and across sessions was evaluated in a sample of 22 adults for five spatial frequencies (0.41-13 cycles/degree) and two temporal durations (33 and 500 ms). Results demonstrate that the shape of the CSF, lowpass versus bandpass, depends on the temporal stimulus condition. Comparisons with previous psychophysical studies and with single-cell data from macaques and humans indicate that the major portion of the CSF, spatial frequencies >1.5 cycles/degree regardless of temporal condition, is determined by a 'sustained' mechanism (presumably parvocellular input to primary visual cortex [V1]). Contrast sensitivity to the lowest spatial frequency tested appears to be generated by a 'transient' mechanism (presumably magnocellular input to V1). The model fits support the hypothesis that the high spatial frequency limb of the CSF reflects the receptive field profile of the center mechanism of the smallest cells in the parvocellular pathway. These findings enhance the value of contrast sensitivity testing in general and increase the accessibility of this technique for use by clinicians through implementation on a commercially-available device.
Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)