학술논문

Is the neighborhood of interaction in human crowds metric, topological, or visual?
Document Type
Academic Journal
Author
Wirth TD; Department of Cognitive Linguistic and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA.; Department of Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.; Dachner GC; Department of Cognitive Linguistic and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA.; Rio KW; Reality Labs, Meta, Redmond, WA 98052, USA.; Department of Cognitive Linguistic and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA.; Warren WH; Department of Cognitive Linguistic and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA.
Source
Publisher: Oxford University Press on behalf of the National Academy of Sciences Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 9918367777906676 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2752-6542 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 27526542 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PNAS Nexus Subsets: PubMed not MEDLINE
Subject
Language
English
Abstract
Global patterns of collective motion in bird flocks, fish schools, and human crowds are thought to emerge from local interactions within a neighborhood of interaction, the zone in which an individual is influenced by their neighbors. Both metric and topological neighborhoods have been reported in animal groups, but this question has not been addressed for human crowds. The answer has important implications for modeling crowd behavior and predicting crowd disasters such as jams, crushes, and stampedes. In a metric neighborhood , an individual is influenced by all neighbors within a fixed radius, whereas in a topological neighborhood , an individual is influenced by a fixed number of nearest neighbors, regardless of their physical distance. A recently proposed alternative is a visual neighborhood , in which an individual is influenced by the optical motions of all visible neighbors. We test these hypotheses experimentally by asking participants to walk in real and virtual crowds and manipulating the crowd's density. Our results rule out a topological neighborhood, are approximated by a metric neighborhood, but are best explained by a visual neighborhood that has elements of both. We conclude that the neighborhood of interaction in human crowds follows naturally from the laws of optics and suggest that previously observed "topological" and "metric" interactions might be a consequence of the visual neighborhood.
(© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of National Academy of Sciences.)