학술논문
Proton density fat fraction MRI of vertebral bone marrow: Accuracy, repeatability, and reproducibility among readers, field strengths, and imaging platforms.
Document Type
Academic Journal
Author
Schmeel FC; Department of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Rheinische-Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW), Germany.; Vomweg T; Radiology Institute Dr. von Essen (DVE), Coblenz, Rhineland-Palatinate (RLP), Germany.; Träber F; Department of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Rheinische-Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW), Germany.; Gerhards A; Radiology Institute Dr. von Essen (DVE), Coblenz, Rhineland-Palatinate (RLP), Germany.; Enkirch SJ; Department of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Rheinische-Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW), Germany.; Faron A; Department of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Rheinische-Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW), Germany.; Sprinkart AM; Department of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Rheinische-Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW), Germany.; Schmeel LC; Department of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Rheinische-Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW), Germany.; Luetkens JA; Department of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Rheinische-Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW), Germany.; Thomas D; Department of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Rheinische-Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW), Germany.; Kukuk GM; Department of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Rheinische-Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW), Germany.
Source
Publisher: Wiley-Liss Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 9105850 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1522-2586 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 10531807 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Magn Reson Imaging Subsets: MEDLINE
Subject
Language
English
Abstract
Background: Chemical shift-encoding based water-fat MRI is an emerging method to noninvasively assess proton density fat fraction (PDFF), a promising quantitative imaging biomarker for estimating tissue fat concentration. However, in vivo validation of PDFF is still lacking for bone marrow applications.
Purpose: To determine the accuracy and precision of MRI-determined vertebral bone marrow PDFF among different readers and across different field strengths and imager manufacturers.
Study Type: Repeatability/reproducibility.
Subjects: Twenty-four adult volunteers underwent lumbar spine MRI with one 1.5T and two different 3.0T MR scanners from two vendors on the same day.
Field Strength/sequence: 1.5T and 3.0T/3D spoiled-gradient echo multipoint Dixon sequences.
Assessment: Two independent readers measured intravertebral PDFF for the three most central slices of the L1-5 vertebral bodies. Single-voxel MR spectroscopy (MRS)-determined PDFF served as the reference standard for PDFF estimation.
Statistical Tests: Accuracy and bias were assessed by Pearson correlation, linear regression analysis, and Bland-Altman plots. Repeatability and reproducibility were evaluated by Wilcoxon signed rank test, Friedman test, and coefficients of variation. Intraclass correlation coefficients were used to validate intra- and interreader as well as intraimager agreements.
Results: MRI-based PDFF estimates of lumbar bone marrow were highly correlated (r2 = 0.899) and accurate (mean bias, -0.6%) against the MRS-determined PDFF reference standard. PDFF showed high linearity (r 2 = 0.972-0.978) and small mean bias (0.6-1.5%) with 95% limits of agreement within ±3.4% across field strengths, imaging platforms, and readers. Repeatability and reproducibility of PDFF were high, with the mean overall coefficient of variation being 0.86% and 2.77%, respectively. The overall intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.986 as a measure for an excellent interreader agreement.
Data Conclusion: MRI-based quantification of vertebral bone marrow PDFF is highly accurate, repeatable, and reproducible among readers, field strengths, and MRI platforms, indicating its robustness as a quantitative imaging biomarker for multicentric studies.
Level of Evidence: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:1762-1772.
(© 2019 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.)
Purpose: To determine the accuracy and precision of MRI-determined vertebral bone marrow PDFF among different readers and across different field strengths and imager manufacturers.
Study Type: Repeatability/reproducibility.
Subjects: Twenty-four adult volunteers underwent lumbar spine MRI with one 1.5T and two different 3.0T MR scanners from two vendors on the same day.
Field Strength/sequence: 1.5T and 3.0T/3D spoiled-gradient echo multipoint Dixon sequences.
Assessment: Two independent readers measured intravertebral PDFF for the three most central slices of the L1-5 vertebral bodies. Single-voxel MR spectroscopy (MRS)-determined PDFF served as the reference standard for PDFF estimation.
Statistical Tests: Accuracy and bias were assessed by Pearson correlation, linear regression analysis, and Bland-Altman plots. Repeatability and reproducibility were evaluated by Wilcoxon signed rank test, Friedman test, and coefficients of variation. Intraclass correlation coefficients were used to validate intra- and interreader as well as intraimager agreements.
Results: MRI-based PDFF estimates of lumbar bone marrow were highly correlated (r
Data Conclusion: MRI-based quantification of vertebral bone marrow PDFF is highly accurate, repeatable, and reproducible among readers, field strengths, and MRI platforms, indicating its robustness as a quantitative imaging biomarker for multicentric studies.
Level of Evidence: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:1762-1772.
(© 2019 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.)