학술논문
Metatarsophalangeal and interphalangeal joint angle measurements on weight-bearing CT images.
Document Type
Academic Journal
Author
Mens MA; Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Rehabilitation and Development, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: marieke.mens@amsterdamumc.nl.; Bouman CMB; Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Rehabilitation and Development, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.; Dobbe JGG; Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Rehabilitation and Development, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Musculoskeletal Health - Restoration and Development, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Microcirculation, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.; Bus SA; Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Rehabilitation Medicine, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Rehabilitation and Development, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.; Nieuwdorp M; Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Internal Medicine, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Diabetes and Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.; Maas M; Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Rehabilitation and Development, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Musculoskeletal Health - Restoration and Development, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.; Wellenberg RHH; Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Rehabilitation and Development, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Musculoskeletal Health - Restoration and Development, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.; Streekstra GJ; Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Rehabilitation and Development, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Musculoskeletal Health - Restoration and Development, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Source
Publisher: Elsevier Ltd Country of Publication: France NLM ID: 9609647 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1460-9584 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 12687731 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Foot Ankle Surg Subsets: MEDLINE
Subject
Language
English
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to present and evaluate methods of measuring toe joint angels using joint-surface based and inertial axes approaches.
Methods: Nine scans of one frozen human cadaveric foot were obtained using weight-bearing CT. Two observers independently segmented bones in the forefoot and measured metatarsalphalangeal joint (MTPJ) angles, proximal and distal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ and DIPJ) angles and interphalangeal angles of the hallux (IPJ) using 1) inertial axes, representing the long anatomical axes, of the bones and 2) axes determined using centroids of articular joint surfaces.
Results: The standard deviations (SD) of the IPJ/PIPJ and DIPJ angles were lower using joint-surface based axes (between 1.5˚ and 4.1˚) than when the inertial axes method was used (between 3.3˚ and 16.4˚), for MTPJ the SD's were similar for both methods (between 0.5˚ and 2.6˚). For the IPJ/PIPJ and DIPJ angles, the width of the 95% CI and the range were also lower using the joint-surface axes method (95% CI: 2.0˚-4.1˚ vs 3.2˚-16.3˚; range: 3.1˚-7.4˚ vs 3.8˚-35.8˚). Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) representing inter- and intra-rater reliability were good to excellent regarding the MTPJ and IPJ/PIPJ angles in both techniques (between 0.85 and 0.99). For DIPJ angles, ICC's were good for the inertial axes method (0.78 and 0.79) and moderate for the joint-surface axes method (0.60 and 0.70).
Conclusion: The joint-surface axes method enables reliable and reproducible measurements of MTPJ, IPJ/PIPJ and DIPJ angles. For PIPJ and DIPJ angles this method is preferable over the use of inertial axes.
Competing Interests: Declaration of interests The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
Methods: Nine scans of one frozen human cadaveric foot were obtained using weight-bearing CT. Two observers independently segmented bones in the forefoot and measured metatarsalphalangeal joint (MTPJ) angles, proximal and distal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ and DIPJ) angles and interphalangeal angles of the hallux (IPJ) using 1) inertial axes, representing the long anatomical axes, of the bones and 2) axes determined using centroids of articular joint surfaces.
Results: The standard deviations (SD) of the IPJ/PIPJ and DIPJ angles were lower using joint-surface based axes (between 1.5˚ and 4.1˚) than when the inertial axes method was used (between 3.3˚ and 16.4˚), for MTPJ the SD's were similar for both methods (between 0.5˚ and 2.6˚). For the IPJ/PIPJ and DIPJ angles, the width of the 95% CI and the range were also lower using the joint-surface axes method (95% CI: 2.0˚-4.1˚ vs 3.2˚-16.3˚; range: 3.1˚-7.4˚ vs 3.8˚-35.8˚). Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) representing inter- and intra-rater reliability were good to excellent regarding the MTPJ and IPJ/PIPJ angles in both techniques (between 0.85 and 0.99). For DIPJ angles, ICC's were good for the inertial axes method (0.78 and 0.79) and moderate for the joint-surface axes method (0.60 and 0.70).
Conclusion: The joint-surface axes method enables reliable and reproducible measurements of MTPJ, IPJ/PIPJ and DIPJ angles. For PIPJ and DIPJ angles this method is preferable over the use of inertial axes.
Competing Interests: Declaration of interests The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)