학술논문

An integrated primary care service to reduce cardiovascular disease risk in people with severe mental illness: Primrose-A - thematic analysis of its acceptability, feasibility, and implementation.
Document Type
Academic Journal
Author
Shaw P; Division of Psychiatry, University College London, 6th Floor, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, W1T 7NF, London, United Kingdom.; Mifsud A; Department of Applied Health Research, UCL, 1-19 Torrington Place, WC1E 7H, London, United Kingdom.; Osborn D; Division of Psychiatry, University College London, 6th Floor, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, W1T 7NF, London, United Kingdom.; Camden and Islington NHS Trust, 4 St Pancras Way, NW1 0PE, London, United Kingdom.; Nahata N; Camden Health Partners LTD, St Pancras Hospital, 4 Saint Pancras Way, South Wing, NW1 0PE, London, United Kingdom.; Hall C; Camden and Islington NHS Trust, 4 St Pancras Way, NW1 0PE, London, United Kingdom.; Prenelle I; Camden and Islington NHS Trust, 4 St Pancras Way, NW1 0PE, London, United Kingdom.; Lamb D; Department of Applied Health Research, UCL, 1-19 Torrington Place, WC1E 7H, London, United Kingdom. d.lamb@ucl.ac.uk.
Source
Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101088677 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1472-6963 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14726963 NLM ISO Abbreviation: BMC Health Serv Res Subsets: MEDLINE
Subject
Language
English
Abstract
Background: Cardiovascular disease among patients with severe mental illness in England is a major preventable contributor to premature mortality. To address this, a nurse and peer-coach delivered service (Primrose-A) was implemented in three London general practices from 2019 (implementation continued during COVID-19). This study aimed to conduct interviews with patient and staff to determine the acceptability of, and experiences with, Primrose-A.
Methods: Semi-structured audio-recorded interviews with eight patients who had received Primrose-A, and 3 nurses, 1 GP, and 1 peer-coach who had delivered Primrose-A in three London-based GP surgeries were conducted. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to identify themes from the transcribed interviews.
Findings: Overall, Primrose-A was viewed positively by patients and staff, with participants describing success in improving patients' mental health, isolation, motivation, and physical health. Therapeutic relationships between staff and patients, and long regular appointments were important facilitators of patient engagement and acceptance of the intervention. Several barriers to the implementation of Primrose-A were identified, including training, administrative and communication issues, burden of time and resources, and COVID-19.
Conclusions: Intervention acceptability could be enhanced by providing longer-term continuity of care paired with more peer-coaching sessions to build positive relationships and facilitate sustained health behaviour change. Future implementation of Primrose-A or similar interventions should consider: (1) training sufficiency (covering physical and mental health, including addiction), (2) adequate staffing to deliver the intervention, (3) facilitation of clear communication pathways between staff, and (4) supporting administrative processes.
(© 2024. The Author(s).)