학술논문
[Impact of a Person Centred Care Model on the quality of life, well-being, and thriving in nursing homes. A cross-sectional study].
Document Type
Academic Journal
Author
Rojano I Luque X; Fundació Salut i Envelliment, UAB, Barcelona, España; Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, España. Electronic address: xavier.rojano@uab.cat.; Serra Marsal E; SUMAR. Serveis Públics d'Acció Social de Catalunya, Girona, España.; Soler Cors O; SUMAR. Serveis Públics d'Acció Social de Catalunya, Girona, España.; Salvà Casanovas A; Fundació Salut i Envelliment, UAB, Barcelona, España; Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, España.
Source
Publisher: Elsevier España Country of Publication: Spain NLM ID: 8009022 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1578-1747 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 0211139X NLM ISO Abbreviation: Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol Subsets: MEDLINE
Subject
Language
Spanish; Castilian
Abstract
Introduction: The aging of the population has led to the introduction of qualitative and quantitative changes in healthcare resources, among which are the introduction of models of person-centred care (PCC), although there is a lack of information on their impact. The objective of this study is to assess the impact of a PCC model on the quality of life, well-being and thriving, in people living in nursing homes METHODS: Cross-sectional study.
Population: all persons who lived indefinitely in the two participating centres that gave their consent. Impact of PCC vs. traditional model was assessed in terms of quality of life, well-being and thriving. Effect size was estimated with Cohen d adjusted for health problems, Charlson index, and presence of depression.
Results: Overall participation was 78% (59/77 persons from the conventional centre and 66/88 from the PCC). The people of the PCC centre had better well-being (d = 0.378) and thriving (d = 0.566). No differences were found in quality of life.
Conclusion: The PCC model can have a positive impact on well-being and thriving in persons living in nursing homes.
(Copyright © 2020 SEGG. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)
Population: all persons who lived indefinitely in the two participating centres that gave their consent. Impact of PCC vs. traditional model was assessed in terms of quality of life, well-being and thriving. Effect size was estimated with Cohen d adjusted for health problems, Charlson index, and presence of depression.
Results: Overall participation was 78% (59/77 persons from the conventional centre and 66/88 from the PCC). The people of the PCC centre had better well-being (d = 0.378) and thriving (d = 0.566). No differences were found in quality of life.
Conclusion: The PCC model can have a positive impact on well-being and thriving in persons living in nursing homes.
(Copyright © 2020 SEGG. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)