학술논문

Empowering the crowd: feasible strategies for epidemic management in high-density informal settlements. The case of COVID-19 in Northwest Syria.
Document Type
Academic Journal
Author
Pascual-García A; Institute of Integrative Biology, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland alberto.pascual@env.ethz.ch.; Klein JD; Office of Population Research, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.; Villers J; Princeton Environmental Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.; Campillo-Funollet E; University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.; Sarkis C; Pax Syriana Foundation, La Valeta, Malta.
Source
Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101685275 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Print ISSN: 2059-7908 (Print) Linking ISSN: 20597908 NLM ISO Abbreviation: BMJ Glob Health Subsets: MEDLINE
Subject
Language
English
ISSN
2059-7908
Abstract
More than 1 billion people live in informal settlements worldwide, where precarious living conditions pose unique challenges to managing a COVID-19 outbreak. Taking Northwest Syria as a case study, we simulated an outbreak in high-density informal Internally Displaced Persons (IDP) camps using a stochastic Susceptible-Exposed-Infectious-Recovered model. Expanding on previous studies, taking social conditions and population health/structure into account, we modelled several interventions feasible in these settings: moderate self-distancing, self-isolation of symptomatic cases and protection of the most vulnerable in 'safety zones'. We considered complementary measures to these interventions that can be implemented autonomously by these communities, such as buffer zones, health checks and carers for isolated individuals, quantifying their impact on the micro-dynamics of disease transmission. All interventions significantly reduce outbreak probability and some of them reduce mortality when an outbreak does occur. Self-distancing reduces mortality by up to 35% if contacts are reduced by 50%. A reduction in mortality by up to 18% can be achieved by providing one self-isolation tent per eight people. Protecting the most vulnerable in a safety zone reduces the outbreak probability in the vulnerable population and has synergistic effects with the other interventions. Our model predicts that a combination of all simulated interventions may reduce mortality by more than 90% and delay an outbreak's peak by almost 2 months. Our results highlight the potential for non-medical interventions to mitigate the effects of the pandemic. Similar measures may be applicable to controlling COVID-19 in other informal settlements, particularly IDP camps in conflict regions, around the world.
Competing Interests: Competing interests: APG is a Board Member of crowdfight COVID19, an initiative from the scientific community to put all available resources at service of the fight against COVID-19. CS (coauthor) is a Board Member of the Pax Syriana Foundation, a non-profit organisation set up for social and philanthropic purposes including promoting and providing support and assistance to civilian aid projects in the fields of education, health,emergency assistance, psychological assistance and humanitarian aid for people affected by wars or humanitarian crises.
(© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)