학술논문

Identification of dental implant systems from low-quality and distorted dental radiographs using AI trained on a large multi-center dataset.
Document Type
Academic Journal
Author
Lee JH; Department of Periodontology, Jeonbuk National University College of Dentistry, 567 Baekje-daero, Deokjin-gu, Jeonju, 54896, Korea. ljaehong@gmail.com.; Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea. ljaehong@gmail.com.; Kim YT; Department of Periodontology, Ilsan Hospital, National Health Insurance Service, Goyang, Korea.; Lee JB; Department of Periodontology, Gangneung-Wonju National University College of Dentistry, Gangneung, Korea.
Source
Publisher: Nature Publishing Group Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101563288 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2045-2322 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 20452322 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Sci Rep Subsets: MEDLINE
Subject
Language
English
Abstract
Most artificial intelligence (AI) studies have attempted to identify dental implant systems (DISs) while excluding low-quality and distorted dental radiographs, limiting their actual clinical use. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of an AI model, trained on a large and multi-center dataset, in identifying different types of DIS in low-quality and distorted dental radiographs. Based on the fine-tuned pre-trained ResNet-50 algorithm, 156,965 panoramic and periapical radiological images were used as training and validation datasets, and 530 low-quality and distorted images of four types (including those not perpendicular to the axis of the fixture, radiation overexposure, cut off the apex of the fixture, and containing foreign bodies) were used as test datasets. Moreover, the accuracy performance of low-quality and distorted DIS classification was compared using AI and five periodontists. Based on a test dataset, the performance evaluation of the AI model achieved accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score metrics of 95.05%, 95.91%, 92.49%, and 94.17%, respectively. However, five periodontists performed the classification of nine types of DISs based on four different types of low-quality and distorted radiographs, achieving a mean overall accuracy of 37.2 ± 29.0%. Within the limitations of this study, AI demonstrated superior accuracy in identifying DIS from low-quality or distorted radiographs, outperforming dental professionals in classification tasks. However, for actual clinical application of AI, extensive standardization research on low-quality and distorted radiographic images is essential.
(© 2024. The Author(s).)