학술논문
Exploring Estimates and Reasons for Lost to Follow-Up Among People Living With HIV on Antiretroviral Therapy in Kisumu County, Kenya.
Document Type
Academic Journal
Author
Samba BO; Center for Microbiology Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), Nairobi, Kenya.; Lewis-Kulzer J; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; and.; Odhiambo F; Center for Microbiology Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), Nairobi, Kenya.; Juma E; Center for Microbiology Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), Nairobi, Kenya.; Mulwa E; Center for Microbiology Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), Nairobi, Kenya.; Kadima J; Center for Microbiology Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), Nairobi, Kenya.; Bukusi EA; Center for Microbiology Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), Nairobi, Kenya.; Cohen CR; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; and.
Source
Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 100892005 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1944-7884 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 15254135 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Subsets: MEDLINE
Subject
Language
English
Abstract
Background: A better understanding why people living with HIV (PLHIV) become lost to follow-up (LTFU) and determining who is LTFU in a program setting is needed to attain HIV epidemic control.
Setting: This retrospective cross-sectional study used an evidence-sampling approach to select health facilities and LTFU patients from a large HIV program supporting 61 health facilities in Kisumu County, Kenya.
Methods: Eligible PLHIV included adults 18 years and older with at least 1 clinic visit between September 1, 2016, and August 31, 2018, and were LTFU (no clinical contact for ≥90 days after their last expected clinic visit). From March to June 2019, demographic and clinical variables were collected from a sample of LTFU patient files at 12 health facilities. Patient care status and retention outcomes were determined through program tracing.
Results: Of 787 LTFU patients selected and traced, 36% were male, median age was 30.5 years (interquartile range: 24.6-38.0), and 78% had their vital status confirmed with 560 (92%) alive and 52 (8%) deceased. Among 499 (89.0%) with a retention outcome, 233 (46.7%) had stopped care while 266 (53.3%) had self-transferred to another facility. Among those who had stopped care, psychosocial reasons were most common {65.2% [95% confidence interval (CI): 58.9 to 71.1]} followed by structural reasons [29.6% (95% CI: 24.1 to 35.8)] and clinic-based reasons [3.0% (95% CI: 1.4 to 6.2)].
Conclusion: We found that more than half of patients LTFU were receiving HIV care elsewhere, leading to a higher overall patient retention rate than routinely reported. Similar strategies could be considered to improve the accuracy of reporting retention in HIV care.
Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
(Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)
Setting: This retrospective cross-sectional study used an evidence-sampling approach to select health facilities and LTFU patients from a large HIV program supporting 61 health facilities in Kisumu County, Kenya.
Methods: Eligible PLHIV included adults 18 years and older with at least 1 clinic visit between September 1, 2016, and August 31, 2018, and were LTFU (no clinical contact for ≥90 days after their last expected clinic visit). From March to June 2019, demographic and clinical variables were collected from a sample of LTFU patient files at 12 health facilities. Patient care status and retention outcomes were determined through program tracing.
Results: Of 787 LTFU patients selected and traced, 36% were male, median age was 30.5 years (interquartile range: 24.6-38.0), and 78% had their vital status confirmed with 560 (92%) alive and 52 (8%) deceased. Among 499 (89.0%) with a retention outcome, 233 (46.7%) had stopped care while 266 (53.3%) had self-transferred to another facility. Among those who had stopped care, psychosocial reasons were most common {65.2% [95% confidence interval (CI): 58.9 to 71.1]} followed by structural reasons [29.6% (95% CI: 24.1 to 35.8)] and clinic-based reasons [3.0% (95% CI: 1.4 to 6.2)].
Conclusion: We found that more than half of patients LTFU were receiving HIV care elsewhere, leading to a higher overall patient retention rate than routinely reported. Similar strategies could be considered to improve the accuracy of reporting retention in HIV care.
Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
(Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)