학술논문
Costs of Definitive Chemoradiation, Surgery, and Adjuvant Radiation Versus De-Escalated Adjuvant Radiation per MC1273 in HPV+ Cancer of the Oropharynx.
Document Type
Academic Journal
Author
Waddle MR; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.; Ma DJ; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.; Visscher SL; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.; Borah BJ; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.; May JM; Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.; Price KA; Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.; Moore EJ; Department of Otolaryngology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.; Patel SH; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona.; Hinni ML; Department of Otolaryngology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.; Chintakuntlawar AV; Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.; Garcia JJ; Division of Anatomic Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.; Graner DE; Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.; Neben-Wittich MA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.; Garces YI; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.; Hallemeier CL; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.; Price DL; Department of Otolaryngology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.; Kasperbauer JL; Department of Otolaryngology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.; Janus JR; Department of Otolaryngology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.; Foote RL; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.; Miller RC; Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee. Electronic address: RCMiller@utmck.edu.
Source
Publisher: Elsevier, Inc Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 7603616 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1879-355X (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 03603016 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Subsets: MEDLINE
Subject
Language
English
Abstract
Purpose: De-escalated treatment for human papillomavirus (HPV)+ oropharynx squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) has shown promising initial results. Health-care policy is increasingly focusing on high-value care. This analysis compares the cost of care for HPV+ OPSCC treated with definitive chemoradiation (CRT), surgery and adjuvant radiation (RT), and surgery and de-escalated CRT on MC1273.
Methods and Materials: MC1273 is a prospective, phase 2 study evaluating adjuvant CRT to 30 to 36 Gy plus docetaxel for HPV+ OPSCC after surgery for high-risk patients. Matched standard-of-care control groups were retrospectively identified for patients treated with definitive CRT or adjuvant RT. Standardized costs were evaluated before radiation, during treatment (during RT), and at short-term (6 month) and long-term (7-24 month) follow-up periods.
Results: A total of 56 definitive CRT, 101 adjuvant RT, and 66 MC1273 patients were included. The CRT arm had more T3-4 disease (63% vs 17-21%) and higher N2c-N3 disease (52% vs 20-24%) vs both other groups. The total treatment costs in the CRT, adjuvant RT, and MC1273 groups were $47,763 (standard deviation [SD], $19,060], $57,845 (SD, $17,480), and $46,007 (SD, $9019), respectively, and the chemotherapy and/or RT costs were $39,936 (SD, $18,480), $26,603 (SD, $12,542), and $17,864 (SD, $3288), respectively. The per-patient, per-month, average short-term follow-up costs were $3860 (SD, $10,525), $1072 (SD, $996), and $972 (SD, $833), respectively, and the long-term costs were $978 (SD, $2294), $485 (SD, $1156), and $653 (SD, $1107), respectively. After adjustment for age, T-stage, and N-stage, treatment costs remained lower for CRT and MC1273 versus adjuvant RT ($45,450 and $47,114 vs $58,590, respectively; P < .001), whereas the total per-patient, per-month follow-up costs were lower in the MC1273 study group and adjuvant RT versus CRT ($853 and $866 vs $2030, respectively; P = .03).
Conclusions: MC1273 resulted in 10% and 20% reductions in global costs compared with standard-of-care adjuvant RT and definitive CRT treatments. Substantial cost savings may be an added benefit to the already noted low toxicity and maintained quality of life of treatment per MC1273.
(Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
Methods and Materials: MC1273 is a prospective, phase 2 study evaluating adjuvant CRT to 30 to 36 Gy plus docetaxel for HPV+ OPSCC after surgery for high-risk patients. Matched standard-of-care control groups were retrospectively identified for patients treated with definitive CRT or adjuvant RT. Standardized costs were evaluated before radiation, during treatment (during RT), and at short-term (6 month) and long-term (7-24 month) follow-up periods.
Results: A total of 56 definitive CRT, 101 adjuvant RT, and 66 MC1273 patients were included. The CRT arm had more T3-4 disease (63% vs 17-21%) and higher N2c-N3 disease (52% vs 20-24%) vs both other groups. The total treatment costs in the CRT, adjuvant RT, and MC1273 groups were $47,763 (standard deviation [SD], $19,060], $57,845 (SD, $17,480), and $46,007 (SD, $9019), respectively, and the chemotherapy and/or RT costs were $39,936 (SD, $18,480), $26,603 (SD, $12,542), and $17,864 (SD, $3288), respectively. The per-patient, per-month, average short-term follow-up costs were $3860 (SD, $10,525), $1072 (SD, $996), and $972 (SD, $833), respectively, and the long-term costs were $978 (SD, $2294), $485 (SD, $1156), and $653 (SD, $1107), respectively. After adjustment for age, T-stage, and N-stage, treatment costs remained lower for CRT and MC1273 versus adjuvant RT ($45,450 and $47,114 vs $58,590, respectively; P < .001), whereas the total per-patient, per-month follow-up costs were lower in the MC1273 study group and adjuvant RT versus CRT ($853 and $866 vs $2030, respectively; P = .03).
Conclusions: MC1273 resulted in 10% and 20% reductions in global costs compared with standard-of-care adjuvant RT and definitive CRT treatments. Substantial cost savings may be an added benefit to the already noted low toxicity and maintained quality of life of treatment per MC1273.
(Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)