학술논문

Funding and Implementation of Recovery Oriented Treatment Programs in the US from 2006-2020.
Document Type
Academic Journal
Author
van den Berk-Clark C; Department of Family and Community Medicine, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA.; Fedorova M; Cleveland Clinic Department of Adult Neurology, Cleveland OH, USA.; Duncan E; Department of Family and Community Medicine, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA.; Ju T; UC Davis Department of Pediatrics, Sacramento, CA, USA.; Pickard J; School of Social Work, University of Missouri St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Source
Publisher: Sage Publications Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 1300031 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1541-4159 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00472379 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Drug Educ Subsets: MEDLINE
Subject
Language
English
Abstract
Background: Not much is known about funding for and implementation of Person-centered, long-term services - referred to as "recovery services." Methods: SAMSHA funding archives from 2004-2020 were analyzed using Latent Class Analysis (LCA). Results: All 50 states (plus DC and Guam) received about 482 recovery-based grants from 2004-2020 (total from 2004-2020 = $425 million vs. 63.3 ± 29.1 million in total SAMSHA funding per year on average). LCA showed 4 trends: peer focused (Pr(Class) = .09, 95%CI = 0.08, 0.10), treatment focused (Pr(Class) = 0.14, 95%CI = 0.12, 0.18), system focused (Pr(Class) = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.54, 0.59) and consumer focused (Pr(Class) = 0.19 (0.17, 0.21). Conclusions: Funding for recovery makes up a relatively low percentage of overall funding for substance prevention and treatment . Implications are discussed.
Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.