학술논문
Basis and applicability of noninvasive inverse electrocardiography: a comparison between cardiac source models.
Document Type
Academic Journal
Author
van der Waal J; Department of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands.; Meijborg V; Department of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands.; Coronel R; Department of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands.; Dubois R; IHU Liryc, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Fondation Bordeaux Université, Pessac, France.; Oostendorp T; Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Source
Publisher: Frontiers Research Foundation Country of Publication: Switzerland NLM ID: 101549006 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Print ISSN: 1664-042X (Print) Linking ISSN: 1664042X NLM ISO Abbreviation: Front Physiol Subsets: PubMed not MEDLINE
Subject
Language
English
ISSN
1664-042X
Abstract
The body surface electrocardiogram (ECG) is a direct result of electrical activity generated by the myocardium. Using the body surface ECGs to reconstruct cardiac electrical activity is called the inverse problem of electrocardiography. The method to solve the inverse problem depends on the chosen cardiac source model to describe cardiac electrical activity. In this paper, we describe the theoretical basis of two inverse methods based on the most commonly used cardiac source models: the epicardial potential model and the equivalent dipole layer model. We discuss similarities and differences in applicability, strengths and weaknesses and sketch a road towards improved inverse solutions by targeted use, sequential application or a combination of the two methods.
Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
(Copyright © 2023 van der Waal, Meijborg, Coronel, Dubois and Oostendorp.)
Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
(Copyright © 2023 van der Waal, Meijborg, Coronel, Dubois and Oostendorp.)