학술논문
Psychological Factors in Chronic Edema: A Case-Control Study.
Document Type
Academic Journal
Author
Moffatt CJ; 1 Division of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, Royal Derby Hospital, The University of Nottingham , Derby, United Kingdom .; Aubeeluck A; 1 Division of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, Royal Derby Hospital, The University of Nottingham , Derby, United Kingdom .; Franks PJ; 2 Centre for Research and Implementation of Clinical Practice , London, United Kingdom .; 3 Division of Nursing and Healthcare, Faculty of Medicine, University of Glasgow , Glasgow, United Kingdom .; Doherty DC; 2 Centre for Research and Implementation of Clinical Practice , London, United Kingdom .; Mortimer P; 4 St. George's University of London , London, United Kingdom .; Quere I; 5 Medecine Vasculaire, EA2992, Universite Montpellier I , CHU Saint Eloi, Montpellier, France .
Source
Publisher: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101163587 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1557-8585 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 15396851 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Lymphat Res Biol Subsets: MEDLINE
Subject
Language
English
Abstract
Background: To examine psychological health and perceived social support in patients with chronic edema (CE).
Methods and Results: A random sample of 107 patients with CE was group matched for age and gender with 102 community controls. The cases had swelling of the arm (38%) and leg (61%) and midline swelling (14%). Cases were more likely to be single or divorced/separated (p = 0.041) and have reduced mobility (p < 0.001). They had significantly poorer overall health related quality of life (HRQoL), in particular physical functioning (p = 0.003); role physical (p < 0.001); general health (p = 0.026); vitality (p = 0.015); social function (p = 0.007); and role emotional (p = 0.041). EQ5-D health index scores were significantly reduced in cases by 13 points (p = <0.001, 95% confidence interval 5.8, 21.6). Cases had similar sized social networks to the control group (5.8 vs. 6.6 p = 0.49), but had lower total perceived social support scores (67.8 vs. 76.1 p = 0.018). CE patients used significantly fewer coping strategies (COPE scale) than controls with regard to the following: active coping (p = 0.024); planning (p < 0.001); and use of instrumental support (p = 0.006). Significantly higher levels of coping were used in restraint (p = 0.031), positive reinterpretation and growth (p < 0.001); acceptance (<0.001); denial (p < 0.001); mental disengagement (p < 0.001); behavioral disengagement (<0.001); substance abuse (p = 0.010); and humor (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: Patients with CE have poorer health and greater impact on many aspects of HRQoL. Perceived social support is reduced. Deficits in social function combined with perceived reduction in support, and reduced mental health and emotional scores indicate the risk of psychological issues. Systems of care should offer an environment to address these issues.
Methods and Results: A random sample of 107 patients with CE was group matched for age and gender with 102 community controls. The cases had swelling of the arm (38%) and leg (61%) and midline swelling (14%). Cases were more likely to be single or divorced/separated (p = 0.041) and have reduced mobility (p < 0.001). They had significantly poorer overall health related quality of life (HRQoL), in particular physical functioning (p = 0.003); role physical (p < 0.001); general health (p = 0.026); vitality (p = 0.015); social function (p = 0.007); and role emotional (p = 0.041). EQ5-D health index scores were significantly reduced in cases by 13 points (p = <0.001, 95% confidence interval 5.8, 21.6). Cases had similar sized social networks to the control group (5.8 vs. 6.6 p = 0.49), but had lower total perceived social support scores (67.8 vs. 76.1 p = 0.018). CE patients used significantly fewer coping strategies (COPE scale) than controls with regard to the following: active coping (p = 0.024); planning (p < 0.001); and use of instrumental support (p = 0.006). Significantly higher levels of coping were used in restraint (p = 0.031), positive reinterpretation and growth (p < 0.001); acceptance (<0.001); denial (p < 0.001); mental disengagement (p < 0.001); behavioral disengagement (<0.001); substance abuse (p = 0.010); and humor (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: Patients with CE have poorer health and greater impact on many aspects of HRQoL. Perceived social support is reduced. Deficits in social function combined with perceived reduction in support, and reduced mental health and emotional scores indicate the risk of psychological issues. Systems of care should offer an environment to address these issues.