학술논문

A happiness approach to valuing health states for children.
Document Type
Academic Journal
Author
Huang L; Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.; Devlin N; Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.; Chen G; Centre for Health Economics, Monash Business School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.; Dalziel K; Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. Electronic address: kim.dalziel@unimelb.edu.au.
Source
Publisher: Pergamon Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 8303205 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1873-5347 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 02779536 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Soc Sci Med Subsets: MEDLINE
Subject
Language
English
Abstract
Preference weights are widely used to score generic health states into utility indexes for estimation of quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and to aid health care funding decisions. To date, health state utilities are predominantly derived using stated preference methods based on decision utility. This paper tests an alternative and generates preference weights using experienced utility for children based on the Child Health Utility 9D (CHU9D) descriptive system. We estimate the relative values of the CHU9D health states with regard to experienced utility, where experienced utility is approximated by self-reported happiness. A nationally-representative longitudinal survey was used including 6090 Australian children aged 12-17 years surveyed over 2014-2018. The derived weights were then applied to calculate the utility decrements for a few common child health conditions. We found that the estimated utility decrements are largely similar to those estimated using the published CHU9D Australian adolescent weights based on decision utility, except for pain and depression. A smaller utility decrement for pain and a larger utility decrement for depression were indicated by experienced utility. We contribute to the literature by showing that using experienced utility methods to generate preference weights for health states is possible, and we discuss some important methodological challenges for future studies such as the impracticability of anchoring to 'dead' when utilizing experienced utility.
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no conflict of interest.
(Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)