학술논문

Health-related quality of life in patients with extremity bone sarcoma after surgical treatment: a systematic review.
Document Type
Academic Journal
Author
Fernando-Canavan L; Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.; Abraham P; Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.; Devlin N; Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.; Tran-Duy A; Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. an.tran@unimelb.edu.au.
Source
Publisher: Springer Netherlands Country of Publication: Netherlands NLM ID: 9210257 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1573-2649 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 09629343 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Qual Life Res Subsets: MEDLINE
Subject
Language
English
Abstract
Purpose: We conducted a systematic review of studies reporting on measurement of health-related quality of life (HRQoL), with a special focus on the use of the preference-weighted instruments, in patients with extremity bone sarcoma treated with limb-salvage surgery or amputation.
Methods: We searched MedLine, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science for English-language studies reporting on HRQoL of patients with bone sarcoma from inception to 28 August 2023. All records found were independently reviewed by two reviewers. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and the CONSORT 2010 checklist to assess the quality of the cohort and randomised studies, respectively.
Results: The search identified 1225 records, of which 16 studies were included for data extraction. Only one study used a preference-weighted instrument for measuring HRQoL in a small sample of patients (n = 28). Ten studies used the generic SF-36 questionnaire, but no preference-weighted HRQoL based on SF-6D was derived from the SF-36 scores. Most studies comparing HRQoL between amputation and limb-salvage surgery reported no significant differences. Twelve cohort studies scored six or more out of nine points based on the NOS. The only randomised study scored 54% on the CONSORT 2010 checklist.
Conclusions: The approaches used to measure HRQoL were inconsistent and outcome scores varied substantially. Only one study used preference-weighted instruments for HRQoL measurement. Future research into the surgical treatment of extremity bone sarcoma should consider the use of preference-weighted instruments to measure HRQoL, which will therefore enable economic evaluation for the growing orthopaedic armamentarium of novel surgical interventions.
Registration: This systematic review was registered with the PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42021282380).
(© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)