학술논문

Pediatric Heart Network Trial of Losartan vs. Atenolol in Children and Young Adults with Marfan Syndrome: Impact on Prescription Practices.
Document Type
Academic Journal
Author
Robertson DM; University of Utah/Primary Children's Hospital, 81 Mario Capecchi Dr, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA. dwightmrob@gmail.com.; US Air Force, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH, USA. dwightmrob@gmail.com.; Truong DT; University of Utah/Primary Children's Hospital, 81 Mario Capecchi Dr, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.; Cox DA; University of Utah/Primary Children's Hospital, 81 Mario Capecchi Dr, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.; Carmichael HL; Intermountain Healthcare/Intermountain Medical Center, Murray, UT, USA.; Ou Z; University of Utah/Department of Internal Medicine/Division of Epidemiology, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.; Minich LL; University of Utah/Primary Children's Hospital, 81 Mario Capecchi Dr, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.; Williams RV; University of Utah/Primary Children's Hospital, 81 Mario Capecchi Dr, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.; Selamet Tierney ES; Stanford University/Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Source
Publisher: Springer Verlag Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 8003849 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1432-1971 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 01720643 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Pediatr Cardiol Subsets: MEDLINE
Subject
Language
English
Abstract
The Pediatric Heart Network (PHN) trial showed similar efficacy of β-blockers (BB) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) for aortic root dilation in Marfan syndrome, but the impact on prescription practices is unknown. We hypothesized BB and ARB prescriptions would increase after the trial results were published (2014). Prescription data (2007-2016) were obtained from outpatient encounters (IBM Marketscan) for Marfan syndrome patients (6 months-25 years old). Excluding 2014 as a washout period, we analyzed two intervals: 2007-2013 and 2015-2016. Medication categories included BB, ARB, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), combination (BB/ARB and/or BB/ACEI), and no drug. Interrupted time-series analysis assessed immediate level change after publication and change in slope for the trend pre- and post-publication. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals from logistic regressions and generalized estimating equation methods accounted for correlation of prescriptions within patients. In 1499 patients (age 14.1 ± 6.1 years, 59% female) seen 2007-2013, BB trended lower [OR 0.91 (0.89, 0.93), p < 0.001] and ARB trended higher [OR 1.12 (1.07, 1.18), p < 0.001], while combination, ACEI, and no drug remained stable. This trend persisted, but was not significant, for BB [OR 0.54 (0.27, 1.08), p = 0.37] and ARB [OR 1.91 (0.55, 6.69), p = 0.31] in 2015-2016. Combination, ACEI, and no drug remained similar. In short term follow-up, changes in prescription practices following publication of the PHN trial were not statistically significant. This may be due to a change seen prior to publication with early adoption of ARBs that was maintained after confirmation of their effectiveness.
(© 2022. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.)