학술논문
Implementation of an audit and feedback module targeting low-value clinical practices in a provincial trauma quality assurance program: a cost-effectiveness study.
Document Type
Academic Journal
Author
Conombo B; Department of Social and Preventative Medicine, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada.; Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit, Trauma - Emergency - Critical Care Medicine, Quebec University Hospital, Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, 18E Rue, Local H-012a, Québec City, Québec, 1401G1J 1Z4, Canada.; Guertin JR; Department of Social and Preventative Medicine, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada.; Hoch JS; Division of Health Policy and Management, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA, USA.; Grimshaw J; Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.; Bérubé M; Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit, Trauma - Emergency - Critical Care Medicine, Quebec University Hospital, Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, 18E Rue, Local H-012a, Québec City, Québec, 1401G1J 1Z4, Canada.; Faculty of Nursing, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada.; Malo C; Faculty of Nursing, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada.; Berthelot S; Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit, Trauma - Emergency - Critical Care Medicine, Quebec University Hospital, Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, 18E Rue, Local H-012a, Québec City, Québec, 1401G1J 1Z4, Canada.; Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada.; Centre de Recherche Intégrée Pour Un Système Apprenant en Santé Et Services Sociaux, Centre Intégré de Santé Et de Services Sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches, Lévis, Québec, Canada.; Lauzier F; Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada.; Stelfox HT; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Medicine and Community Health Sciences, O'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.; Turgeon AF; Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit, Trauma - Emergency - Critical Care Medicine, Quebec University Hospital, Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, 18E Rue, Local H-012a, Québec City, Québec, 1401G1J 1Z4, Canada.; Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada.; Archambault P; Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada.; VITAM-Centre de Recherche en Santé Durable, Québec City, Québec, Canada.; Belcaid A; Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit, Trauma - Emergency - Critical Care Medicine, Quebec University Hospital, Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, 18E Rue, Local H-012a, Québec City, Québec, 1401G1J 1Z4, Canada.; Moore L; Department of Social and Preventative Medicine, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada. lynne.moore@fmed.ulaval.ca.; Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit, Trauma - Emergency - Critical Care Medicine, Quebec University Hospital, Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, 18E Rue, Local H-012a, Québec City, Québec, 1401G1J 1Z4, Canada. lynne.moore@fmed.ulaval.ca.
Source
Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101088677 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1472-6963 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14726963 NLM ISO Abbreviation: BMC Health Serv Res Subsets: MEDLINE
Subject
Language
English
Abstract
Background: Audit and Feedback (A&F) interventions based on quality indicators have been shown to lead to significant improvements in compliance with evidence-based care including de-adoption of low-value practices (LVPs). Our primary aim was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of adding a hypothetical A&F module targeting LVPs for trauma admissions to an existing quality assurance intervention targeting high-value care and risk-adjusted outcomes. A secondary aim was to assess how certain A&F characteristics might influence its cost-effectiveness.
Methods: We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis using a probabilistic static decision analytic model in the Québec trauma care continuum. We considered the Québec Ministry of Health perspective. Our economic evaluation compared a hypothetical scenario in which the A&F module targeting LVPs is implemented in a Canadian provincial trauma quality assurance program to a status quo scenario in which the A&F module is not implemented. In scenarios analyses we assessed the impact of A&F characteristics on its cost-effectiveness. Results are presented in terms of incremental costs per LVP avoided.
Results: Results suggest that the implementation of A&F module (Cost = $1,480,850; Number of LVPs = 6,005) is associated with higher costs and higher effectiveness compared to status quo (Cost = $1,124,661; Number of LVPs = 8,228). The A&F module would cost $160 per LVP avoided compared to status quo. The A&F module becomes more cost-effective with the addition of facilitation visits; more frequent evaluation; and when only high-volume trauma centers are considered.
Conclusion: A&F module targeting LVPs is associated with higher costs and higher effectiveness than status quo and has the potential to be cost-effective if the decision-makers' willingness-to-pay is at least $160 per LVP avoided. This likely represents an underestimate of true ICER due to underestimated costs or missed opportunity costs. Results suggest that virtual facilitation visits, frequent evaluation, and implementing the module in high-volume centers can improve cost-effectiveness.
(© 2024. The Author(s).)
Methods: We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis using a probabilistic static decision analytic model in the Québec trauma care continuum. We considered the Québec Ministry of Health perspective. Our economic evaluation compared a hypothetical scenario in which the A&F module targeting LVPs is implemented in a Canadian provincial trauma quality assurance program to a status quo scenario in which the A&F module is not implemented. In scenarios analyses we assessed the impact of A&F characteristics on its cost-effectiveness. Results are presented in terms of incremental costs per LVP avoided.
Results: Results suggest that the implementation of A&F module (Cost = $1,480,850; Number of LVPs = 6,005) is associated with higher costs and higher effectiveness compared to status quo (Cost = $1,124,661; Number of LVPs = 8,228). The A&F module would cost $160 per LVP avoided compared to status quo. The A&F module becomes more cost-effective with the addition of facilitation visits; more frequent evaluation; and when only high-volume trauma centers are considered.
Conclusion: A&F module targeting LVPs is associated with higher costs and higher effectiveness than status quo and has the potential to be cost-effective if the decision-makers' willingness-to-pay is at least $160 per LVP avoided. This likely represents an underestimate of true ICER due to underestimated costs or missed opportunity costs. Results suggest that virtual facilitation visits, frequent evaluation, and implementing the module in high-volume centers can improve cost-effectiveness.
(© 2024. The Author(s).)