학술논문

Development of new outcome measures for adult SMA type III and IV: a multimodal longitudinal study.
Document Type
Article
Source
Journal of Neurology. May2021, Vol. 268 Issue 5, p1792-1802. 11p.
Subject
*LONGITUDINAL method
*SPINAL muscular atrophy
*MUSCLE strength testing
*CERVICAL cord
*TIBIALIS anterior
Language
ISSN
0340-5354
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was the comprehensive characterisation of longitudinal clinical, electrophysiological and neuroimaging measures in type III and IV adult spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) with a view to propose objective monitoring markers for future clinical trials. Methods: Fourteen type III or IV SMA patients underwent standardised assessments including muscle strength testing, functional evaluation (SMAFRS and MFM), MUNIX (abductor pollicis brevis, APB; abductor digiti minimi, ADM; deltoid; tibialis anterior, TA; trapezius) and quantitative cervical spinal cord MRI to appraise segmental grey and white matter atrophy. Patients underwent a follow-up assessment with the same protocol 24 months later. Longitudinal comparisons were conducted using the Wilcoxon-test for matched data. Responsiveness was estimated using standardized response means (SRM) and a composite score was generated based on the three most significant variables. Results: Significant functional decline was observed based on SMAFRS (p = 0.019), pinch and knee flexion strength (p = 0.030 and 0.027), MUNIX and MUSIX value in the ADM (p = 0.0006 and 0.043) and in TA muscle (p = 0.025). No significant differences were observed based on cervical MRI measures. A significant reduction was detected in the composite score (p = 0.0005, SRM = −1.52), which was the most responsive variable and required a smaller number of patients than single variables in the estimation of sample size for clinical trials. Conclusions: Quantitative strength testing, SMAFRS and MUNIX readily capture disease progression in adult SMA patients. Composite multimodal scores increase predictive value and may reduce sample size requirements in clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]