Abstract
Introduction: Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) following systemic thrombolysis for ischemic stroke is often devastating, and open surgical evacuation is considered dangerous due to the increased risk of perioperative bleeding, and stereotactic placement of a catheter is too time-consuming. We therefore evaluated the feasibility of a free-hand bedside catheter technique for emergency hematoma evacuation.Methods: Patients who had a supratentorial sICH after thrombolysis, a hematoma volume > 30 ml, and an ensuing reduction in vigilance were consecutively treated with acute minimally invasive catheter hematoma evacuation. Catheter insertion and trajectory were planned via 3D-reconstructed computed tomography (CT) scan, and free-hand insertion of an external ventricular catheter into the core of the hematoma was performed bedside, followed by careful blood aspiration. Cranial CT was used to verify catheter position and residual hematoma volume. In cases, where the residual volume exceeded 15 ml, urokinase (5000 IE) was administered into the clot every 6 h until the volume decreased to < 15 ml.Results: In all six patients, catheter aspiration immediately reduced hematoma volume by 77%, from 73 ± 20 ml to 17 ± 16 ml (p = 0.028). In four patients, the hematoma was almost completely removed (< 10 ml) by singular aspiration. In the remaining two patients with a residual hematoma size > 15 ml, consecutive urokinase application resulted in a further reduction to 1 ml and 15 ml, respectively, after 30 h. The median National Institues of Health Stroke Scale/Score after sICH was 19.5 points, rapidly decreasing to 11 after catheter aspiration (p = 0.027), and further improving to 4 at discharge. No procedure-related complications were observed.Conclusions: Emergency free-hand bedside catheter aspiration is a reasonable option for hematoma evacuation in large thrombolysis-associated sICH when performed by experienced neurosurgeons. Larger studies would help in determining the generalizability of our findings to other centers and assessing their impact on functional outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]