학술논문

Assessment of the architecture and integrity of frozen‐thawed testicular tissue from (pre)pubertal boys with cancer.
Document Type
Article
Source
Andrology. Feb2022, Vol. 10 Issue 2, p279-290. 12p.
Subject
*HEMATOPOIETIC stem cell transplantation
*DNA replication
*SEMINIFEROUS tubules
*SERTOLI cells
*FERTILITY preservation
Language
ISSN
2047-2919
Abstract
Background: Testicular tissue freezing is proposed for fertility preservation to (pre)pubertal boys with cancer before highly gonadotoxic treatment. Studies accurately comparing human (pre)pubertal testicular tissue quality before freezing and after thawing are exceptional. No study has reported this approach in a systematic manner and routine care. Objectives: To assess the impact of a control slow freezing protocol on testicular tissue architecture and integrity of (pre)pubertal boys after thawing. Materials and methods: (Pre)pubertal boys (n = 87) with cancer from 8 Reproductive Biology Laboratories of the French CECOS network benefited from testicular tissue freezing before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Seminiferous tubule cryodamage was determined histologically by scoring morphological alterations and by quantifying intratubular spermatogonia and the expression of DNA replication and repair marker in frozen‐thawed testicular fragments. Results: A significant increase in nuclear and epithelial score alterations was observed after thawing (p < 0.0001). The global lesional score remained lower than 1.5 and comparable to fresh testicular tissue. The number of intratubular spermatogonia and the expression of DNA replication and repair marker in spermatogonia and Sertoli cells did not vary significantly after thawing. These data showed the good preservation of the seminiferous tubule integrity and architecture after thawing, as previously reported in our studies performed in prepubertal mice and rats. Discussion: The current study reports, for the first time, the development of a semi‐quantitative analysis of cryodamage in human (pre)pubertal testicular tissue, using a rapid and useful tool that can be proposed in routine care to develop an internal and external quality control for testicular tissue freezing. This tool can also be used when changing one or several parameters of the freezing‐thawing procedure. Conclusion: Control slow freezing protocol without seeding maintains the seminiferous tubule architecture and integrity, the concentration of spermatogonia and the expression of DNA replication and repair marker in spermatogonia and Sertoli cells after thawing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]