학술논문

Forecasting future prevalence and gender differences in binge drinking among young adults through 2040.
Document Type
Article
Source
Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research. Oct2021, Vol. 45 Issue 10, p2069-2079. 11p.
Subject
*SUBSTANCE abuse
*CONFIDENCE intervals
*AGE distribution
*BINGE drinking
*PUBLIC health
*REGRESSION analysis
*COMMUNITY support
*SEX distribution
*RISK assessment
*FORECASTING
*DISEASE prevalence
*DESCRIPTIVE statistics
*STATISTICAL models
*PREDICTION models
*RESIDENTIAL patterns
*LONGITUDINAL method
*ADULTS
*ADOLESCENCE
Language
Abstract
Background: Binge drinking among adolescents and young adults has changed over time, but patterns differ by age and gender. Identifying high‐risk groups to target future efforts at reducing drinking in this population remains a public health priority. Forecasting methods can provide a better understanding of variation and determinants of future binge drinking prevalence. Methods: We implemented regression‐based forecasting models to estimate the prevalence and gender differences in binge drinking among cohort groups of U.S. young adults, ages 18, 23–24, and 29–30 through 2040. Forecasting models were adjusted for covariates accounting for changes in demographic, Big‐5 social roles (e.g., residential independence), and drinking norms and related substance use, to understand the drivers of forecasted binge drinking estimates. Results: From the last observed cohort group (years varied by age) through 2040, unadjusted binge drinking prevalence was forecasted to decrease from 26% (95% CI: 20, 33%) (2011–15) to 11% (95% CI: 4, 27%) at age 18, decrease from 38% (95% CI: 30, 45%) (2006–2010) to 34% (95% CI: 18, 55%) at ages 23/24, and increase from 32% (95% CI: 25, 40%) (2001–2005) to 35% (95% CI: 16, 59%) at ages 29/30. Gender‐stratified forecasts show a continuation in the narrowing of binge drinking prevalence between young men and women, though the magnitude of narrowing differs by age. Estimated trends were partially explained by changing norms regarding drinking and other substance use, though these indirect effects explained less of the total trend as age increased. Conclusions: Understanding how covariates influence binge drinking trends can guide public health policies to leverage the most important determinants of future binge drinking to reduce the harm caused by binge drinking from adolescence to adulthood. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Online Access