학술논문
Interests and Choices in Determining Death by Neurological Criteria.
Document Type
Article
Author
Source
Subject
*BRAIN death laws
*BRAIN death
*INFORMED consent (Medical law)
*DECISION making
*NEUROLOGIC examination
*
*
*
*
Language
ISSN
1526-5161
Abstract
The article presents the discussion on Philosophers and theologians contest its moral significance, clinicians and bioscientists debate its probative accuracy. Topics include death determination in clinical settings should involve an informational exchange between clinicians and patient surrogate decision makers; and admit different criteria for determining death, individuals and families should be made aware of the implications of applying one criterion over another.