학술논문

Eye plaque brachytherapy versus enucleation for ocular melanoma: an analysis from the National Cancer Database.
Document Type
Article
Source
Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy. 2020, Vol. 12 Issue 4, p303-310. 8p.
Subject
*RADIOISOTOPE brachytherapy
*CILIARY body
*PROPENSITY score matching
*PATIENT selection
*CHI-squared test
Language
ISSN
1689-832X
Abstract
Purpose: There is no current randomized data comparing the efficacy of brachytherapy and enucleation for patients with larger sized tumors. The purpose of the present study was to use a large, contemporary database to deter- mine current practice patterns and compare survival outcomes between different management options for patients with choroidal melanoma of various sizes. Material and methods: The National Cancer Database was queried (2004-2014) for histologically-confirmed choroidal melanoma for patients treated with brachytherapy versus enucleation. Chi-square test was used to compare categorized demographic and clinical variables in both arms. Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluated overall survival (OS). Cox proportional hazards assessment determined variables associated with OS. Patients were divided into cohorts rep- resenting small, medium, and large tumors. Propensity scores matching (PSM) was utilized to compare more similar cohorts. Results: A total of 7,096 patients met the selection criteria; 5,501 (78%) patients received brachytherapy and 1,595 (22%) patients were treated with enucleation. After PSM, 5-yr OS for small tumors was 87% vs. 64%, for medium tumors was 77% vs. 57%, and for large tumors was 68% vs. 46% for brachytherapy and enucleation, respectively (p < 0.001). Following PSM, multivariate Cox regression found older age (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.51-2.06), more comorbidities (HR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.25-1.70), extraocular extension (EOE) (HR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.06-1.48), ciliary body invasion (CBI) (HR = 1.20, 95% CI = 1.02-1.40), and larger size (HR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.40-1.66) were negative prognosticators of survival. Brachytherapy was a positive prognosticator of survival (HR = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.40-0.51). Conclusions: Patients selected for brachytherapy had improved survival compared to enucleation in all size co- horts. EOE and CBI are significantly higher in the enucleation cohort and are important negative prognosticators for survival selected against patients having brachytherapy. Brachytherapy is a reasonable treatment option for certain patients with large size tumors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]