부산대학교 도서관

Summary: As SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccines have started to be rolled out, a key question facing transplant units has been whether listing for transplantation should be contingent on recipients having received a vaccine. We aimed to provide an ethical framework when considering potential transplant candidates who decline vaccination. We convened a working group comprising transplant professionals, lay members and patients and undertook a literature review and consensus process. This group's work was also informed by discussions in two hospital clinical ethics committees. We have reviewed arguments for and against mandating vaccination prior to listing for kidney transplantation and considered some practical difficulties which may be associated with a policy of mandated vaccination. Rather than requiring that all patients must receive the SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccine prior to transplant listing, we recommend considering vaccination status as one of a number of SARS‐CoV‐2‐related risk factors in relation to transplant listing. Transplant units should engage in individualised risk–benefit discussions with patients, avoid the language of mandated treatments and strongly encourage uptake of the vaccine in all patient groups, using tailor‐made educational initiatives. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]