학술논문
Guideline adherence in acute coronary syndromes between telemedically supported paramedics and conventional on-scene physician care: A longitudinal pre–post intervention cohort study.
Document Type
Article
Author
Source
Subject
*CHI-squared test
*ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY
*EMERGENCY medical services
*EMERGENCY medicine
*FISHER exact test
*LONGITUDINAL method
*MEDICAL consultation
*MEDICAL protocols
*STATISTICS
*T-test (Statistics)
*TELEMEDICINE
*LOGISTIC regression analysis
*DATA analysis
*PRE-tests & post-tests
*RETROSPECTIVE studies
*DATA analysis software
*ACUTE coronary syndrome
*DESCRIPTIVE statistics
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Language
ISSN
1460-4582
Abstract
Health informatics applications reduce time intervals in acute coronary syndromes, but their impact on guideline adherence is unknown. This pre–post intervention study compared guideline adherence between telemedically supported (n = 101, April 2014–July 2015) and conventional on-scene care (n = 120, January 2014–March 2014) in acute coronary syndrome. A multivariate logistic regression was performed for dependent variables: adverse events 0 versus 0, p = NA; electrocardiogram 101 versus 120, p = NA; acetylic salicylic acid 91 versus 102, p = 0.21; heparin 92 versus 112, p = 0.99; morphine 96 versus 107, p = 0.33; oxygen 83 versus 102, p = 0.92; glyceroltrinitrate 55 versus 90, p = 0.038; correct destination: 100 versus 119, p = 1.0. The time from ambulance arrival to hospital arrival was prolonged with telemedicine: 48.7 ± 11 min versus 35.5 ± 8.1 min, p < 0.001. Guideline adherence showed no differences except for glyceroltrinitrate. Prolonged time requirements are critical, though explainable. However, this approach enables a timely and high-quality backup strategy if only paramedics are on-scene. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]