학술논문

Structural features regulated photoluminescence intensity and cell internalization of carbon and graphene quantum dots for bioimaging.
Document Type
Article
Source
Materials Science & Engineering: C. Oct2021, Vol. 129, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Subject
*QUANTUM dots
*QUANTUM confinement effects
*BIO-imaging sensors
*PHOTOLUMINESCENCE
*GRAPHENE
*CORAL bleaching
Language
ISSN
0928-4931
Abstract
Carbon-based nanostructures with nanometer dimensions have been identified as potential photoluminescence probes for bioimaging due to their biocompatibility, tunable bandgap, and resistance to photobleaching. However, the influence of structural features of carbon quantum dots (CQDs) and graphene quantum dots (GQDs) in bioimaging has not been explored previously. In the present investigation, we elucidated the mechanism of higher PL in GQDs as compared to CQDs as a function of their structural features. TEM and AFM studies revealed that CQDs were spherical (size ~5 nm), while GQDs showed zigzag edges (size ~3 nm). Further, XRD and NMR studies confirmed that CQDs and GQDs show amorphous and crystalline structures with greater sp 2 clusters, respectively. While both the QDs demonstrated multicolor fluorescence against variable excitations with similar lifetime, GQDs showed 7-fold higher QY than CQDs. Bioimaging studies in 2D cell culture, 3D tumoroids, and in vivo suggested a greater intensity of fluorescence in GQDs than CQDs. Additionally, rapid cell internalization was observed in GQDs owing to their positive surface potential by heterogeneous atomic (N and S) doping. Moreover, both CQDs and GQDs have demonstrated better time dependent stability for fluorescence properties. Taken together, the proposed mechanism elucidates the greater PL intensity in GQDs due to quantum confinement effect, crystallinity, and surface edge effects and is a better candidate for bioimaging amongst the carbon family. [Display omitted] • Highly stable and strong PL of GQDs were synthesized by adopting the hydrothermal method. • Established a clear mechanism to explain the greater PL in GQDs over CQDs. • Stronger PL in GQDs by sp2 clusters, confinement effect, and surface edge effect, while fewer PL in CQDs by surface defects. • The GQDs demonstrated faster cell and nucleus internalization by utilizing surface charge. • The GQDs displayed intense PL in ex vivo and in vivo models. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]