학술논문

Single-center, single-dose, open-label, randomized, two-period crossover study on the bioavailability of methotrexate administered using a novel prefilled, needle-free delivery system.
Document Type
Journal Article
Source
Current Medical Research & Opinion. Apr2017, Vol. 33 Issue 4, p605-611. 7p.
Subject
*INJECTIONS
*PHARMACOKINETICS
*METHOTREXATE
*BIOAVAILABILITY
*COMPARATIVE studies
*CROSSOVER trials
*HYPODERMIC needles
*RESEARCH methodology
*MEDICAL cooperation
*RESEARCH
*EVALUATION research
*RANDOMIZED controlled trials
Language
ISSN
0300-7995
Abstract
Objective: Zeneo 1 is a needle-free injection device. We performed a pharmacokinetic study to investigate the bioequivalence of methotrexate administered subcutaneously using either the needle-free injection device or a conventional needle and syringe.Research Design and Methods: This was a single-dose, open-label, laboratory-blind, randomized crossover study performed in adult healthy volunteers. Each participant received two methotrexate injections (each 25 mg), one via needle-free injection device and one via conventional injection, with a 21-28 day wash-out interval between dosing. For each participant, the administration site for both injections was either the abdomen or the thigh.Main Outcome Measures: The primary pharmacokinetic outcome parameters were AUC(0-t) and Cmax. Bioequivalence was assessed by standard criteria: whether 90% confidence intervals of geometric mean ratios for the two administration methods were within 80-125%.Results: Fifty-two individuals completed the study. Bioequivalence criteria were met for AUC(0-t), for the overall analysis (both injection sites: 90% confidence interval: 99.4-103.1%), and for each injection site separately. Bioequivalence was similarly demonstrated with AUC(0-∞). Bioequivalence criteria for Cmax were fulfilled for abdominal administration but not for the overall analysis. Injection via the needle-free injection device was well tolerated.Limitations: Limitations include conducting the study in healthy volunteers and the relatively small subject number (albeit satisfactory for bioequivalence).Conclusions: This study shows that methotrexate injection via needle-free injection device is bioequivalent to a conventional needle and syringe in relation to AUC(0-t) and AUC(0-∞). Studies of needle-free injection device use in patients requiring methotrexate therapy are planned. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]