학술논문

A review of the characteristics of intermediate assessment and their relationship with student grades.
Document Type
Article
Source
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2018, Vol. 43 Issue 6, p908-929. 22p.
Subject
*EDUCATIONAL tests & measurements
*MIDTERM examinations
*PEER review of students
*INTERMEDIATE service units (Education)
*HIGHER education
Language
ISSN
0260-2938
Abstract
In-course assessment, such as midterms, quizzes or presentations, is often an integral part of higher education courses. These so-called intermediate assessments influence students' final grades. The current review investigates which characteristics of intermediate assessment relate to these grades. In total, 88 articles were reviewed that examined the relationship between intermediate assessment and student grades. Four main characteristics were identified: the use of feedback, whether the assessment is mandatory, who is the assessor, and the reward students get for participating. Results indicate that corrective feedback leads to the most positive results, but elaborate feedback may benefit lower achieving groups. No difference in results was found for mandatory versus voluntary intermediate assessments. Peer assessment seemed to be beneficial, and rewarding students with course credit improves grades more than other rewards. Three scenarios are presented on how teachers can combine the different characteristics to optimise their intermediate assessment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]