학술논문

Randomised controlled trial on robot‐assisted versus manual surgery for pucker peeling.
Document Type
Article
Source
Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology. Dec2022, Vol. 50 Issue 9, p1057-1064. 8p.
Subject
*RANDOMIZED controlled trials
*SURGICAL robots
*CHEMICAL peel
*SURGERY
*VISUAL acuity
*FORCEPS
Language
ISSN
1442-6404
Abstract
Background: The aim was to explore the feasibility and safety of performing common surgical steps in epiretinal membrane (ERM) peeling using the Preceyes Surgical System (PSS). Methods: In a tertiary centre, 15 pseudophakic patients with an idiopathic ERM were randomised to robot‐assistance or manual surgery in a 2:1 ratio. In the robot‐assisted group, the following steps were performed using PSS: (1) staining the internal limiting membrane (ILM), (2) removal of the dye, (3) creating an ILM flap, (4) completing the peeling, (5) holding a light pipe and (6) fluid–air exchange. Primary outcome measures were feasibility and safety. Secondary outcome measures were duration, best‐corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT). Moreover, the distance travelled by the instrument during peeling was assessed using motion tracking software. Results: All steps performed with PSS were feasible with no clinical adverse events or complications. The surgical time was longer in the robot‐assisted group (mean 56 min, SD = 12 vs. 24 min, SD = 5). During the study, the duration of robot‐assisted surgeries decreased from 72 to 46 min. The distance travelled by the forceps was shorter in the robot‐assisted group (mean 403 mm, SD = 186 vs. 550 mm, SD = 134). BCVA and CRT improved equally in both groups. Conclusions: This is the world's first randomised controlled trial on robotic surgery for ERM. Although more time‐consuming, we found that several surgical steps were feasible with assistance of the PSS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]