학술논문

Selinexor for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.
Document Type
Article
Source
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice. Apr2024, Vol. 30 Issue 3, p535-546. 12p.
Subject
*THERAPEUTIC use of antineoplastic agents
*MULTIPLE myeloma
*HETEROCYCLIC compounds
*CANCER relapse
*CARRIER proteins
*PATIENT safety
*CANCER patient medical care
*CANCER patients
*DESCRIPTIVE statistics
*SYSTEMATIC reviews
*PEPTIDES
*GENE expression
*MEDLINE
*DRUG efficacy
*ONLINE information services
*PROGRESSION-free survival
*OVERALL survival
*TIME
*EVALUATION
*CHEMICAL inhibitors
Language
ISSN
1078-1552
Abstract
Objective: Multiple myeloma cells resist standard therapies due to overexpression of the transport protein, exportin 1. Selinexor is a novel drug that targets the Exportin 1 protein in these cells. Data source: A comprehensive search was done, and data showing the efficacy and safety of selinexor in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma was collected using PubMed, Google Scholar, and clincialtrials.gov. Data summary: Results from the clinical trials STORM, BOSTON, and STOMP were included. Parts I and II of the STORM trial revealed a progression-free survival (PFS) of 4.7 and 3.7 months, a median duration of response of 6.2 and 4.4 months, and an overall survival of 7.3 and 8.4 months, respectively. BOSTON trial's SVd arm (selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone) had a median follow-up period of 13.2 months and an mPFS of 13.93 months. The Vd arm (bortezomib and dexamethasone) had a median follow-up duration of 16.5 months and an mPFS of 9.46 months. The STOMP trial is still active and has limited data available. The SKd arm (selinexor, carfilzomib, and dexamethasone) reported an overall response rate of 66.7% in patients with triple refractory multiple myeloma, and 82% in patients with high-risk cytogenetics. The SPd arm (selinexor, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone) shows an overall response rate of 54.30% in pomalidomide naïve-nonrefractory, 35.70% in pomalidomide refractory and 60% in those dosed at RP2D. SRd arm (selinexor, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone) shows an overall response rate of 91.7% in lenalidomide naïve and 12.5% in lenalidomide refractory patients. SVd (selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone) arm reported an overall response rate of 63% in all patients while the SDd arm (selinexor, daratumumab, and dexamethasone) showed an overall response rate of 73%. Conclusion: To improve the outcome of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, it is critical to develop new therapies, assess potential therapeutic synergies, and overcome drug resistance by determining the efficacy of multiple myeloma therapies across multiple disease subgroups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]