학술논문
Cognitive impact of multidomain intervention and omega 3 according to blood Aβ42/40 ratio: a subgroup analysis from the randomized MAPT trial.
Document Type
Article
Author
Delrieu, Julien; Vellas, Bruno; Guyonnet, Sophie; Cantet, Christelle; Ovod, Vitaliy; Li, Yan; Bollinger, James; Bateman, Randall; Andrieu, Sandrine; Carrié, Isabelle; Brigitte, Lauréane; Faisant, Catherine; Lala, Françoise; Villars, Hélène; Combrouze, Emeline; Badufle, Carole; Zueras, Audrey; Morin, Christophe; Van Kan, Gabor Abellan; Dupuy, Charlotte
Source
Subject
*RATIO analysis
*MOTIVATIONAL interviewing
*SUBGROUP analysis (Experimental design)
*AMYLOID
*MULTIPLE comparisons (Statistics)
*
*
*
*
Language
ISSN
1758-9193
Abstract
Background: In MAPT (Multidomain Alzheimer Preventive Trial), a cognitive effect of multidomain intervention (MI) was showed in non-demented subjects with positive amyloid PET. However, screening eligible patients for multidomain intervention by PET is difficult to generalize in real-world settings. Methods: MAPT study was a 3-year, randomized, placebo-controlled trial followed by a 2-year observational and optional extension. All participants were non-demented and randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to the MI plus omega 3, MI plus placebo, omega 3 alone, or placebo alone group. The objectives were to assess the cognitive effect of MAPT interventions (omega 3 supplementation, MI, combined intervention) in non-demented subjects according to amyloid blood status at 12, 36, and 60 months. In this subgroup analysis (n = 483), amyloid status was defined by plasma Aβ42/40 ratio (cutoff ≤ 0.0107). The primary outcome measure was the change in cognitive composite score after a 1, 3, and 5-year clinical follow-up. Results: The intention-to-treat (ITT) population included 483 subjects (161 positive and 322 negative amyloid participants based on plasma Aβ42/40 ratio). In the positive amyloid ITT population, we showed a positive effect of MI plus omega 3 on the change in composite cognitive score in 12 (raw p =.0350, 0.01917, 95% CI = [0.0136 to 0.3699]) and 36 months (raw p =.0357, 0.2818, 95% CI = [0.0190 to 0.5446]). After correction of multiple comparisons and adjustments, these differences were not significant (adjusted p =.1144 and.0690). In the per-protocol positive amyloid group (n = 154), we observed a significant difference between the combined intervention and placebo groups at 12 (p =.0313, 0.2424, 0.0571 to 0.4276) and 36 months (p =.0195, 0.3747, 0.1055 to 0.6439) persisting after adjustment. In the ITT and per-protocol analyses, no cognitive effect was observed in the positive and negative amyloid group at 60-month visit. Conclusions: These findings suggest a benefit of MI plus omega 3 in positive blood amyloid subjects. This promising trend needs to be confirmed before using blood biomarkers for screening in preventive trials. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01513252. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]