학술논문

Food allergy: which tests are worth doing and which are not?
Document Type
Article
Source
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry. Jul2011, Vol. 48 Issue 4, p300-309. 10p. 1 Color Photograph, 6 Charts.
Subject
*FOOD allergy
*ALLERGENS
*IMMUNOLOGIC diseases
*SERUM
*MICROBIOLOGICAL assay
Language
ISSN
0004-5632
Abstract
Adverse reactions to foods may arise by a variety of mechanisms, both immune (IgE and non-IgE) and non-immune mediated. This article considers those assays useful in the diagnosis of Type 1 hypersensitivity to foods (IgE-based) and, importantly, discusses those assays where evidence is lacking for their use. In all cases of suspected food allergy, a full clinical history is indispensable in facilitating diagnosis. Total serum IgE is not a suitable screen for food allergy. Suspect allergens may be confirmed by either skin prick testing or serological assays for specific IgE. Several studies suggest concentrations of foodspecific IgE at which there is a high probability of reaction on food challenge. These cut-off levels are now being used by physicians to direct clinical advice. However, it is important to note that not all studies agree on these limits and the chosen cut-off is dependent on the population studied and the assay used. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]