학술논문

Questionnaire-Based Polyexposure Assessment Outperforms Polygenic Scores for Classification of Type 2 Diabetes in a Multiancestry Cohort.
Document Type
Article
Source
Diabetes Care. May2023, Vol. 46 Issue 5, p929-937. 9p. 1 Color Photograph, 1 Diagram, 2 Charts, 2 Graphs.
Subject
*TYPE 2 diabetes
*COAL dust
*INCOME
*LOGISTIC regression analysis
*ENVIRONMENTAL risk
Language
ISSN
0149-5992
Abstract
Objective: Environmental exposures may have greater predictive power for type 2 diabetes than polygenic scores (PGS). Studies examining environmental risk factors, however, have included only individuals with European ancestry, limiting the applicability of results. We conducted an exposome-wide association study in the multiancestry Personalized Environment and Genes Study to assess the effects of environmental factors on type 2 diabetes.Research Design and Methods: Using logistic regression for single-exposure analysis, we identified exposures associated with type 2 diabetes, adjusting for age, BMI, household income, and self-reported sex and race. To compare cumulative genetic and environmental effects, we computed an overall clinical score (OCS) as a weighted sum of BMI and prediabetes, hypertension, and high cholesterol status and a polyexposure score (PXS) as a weighted sum of 13 environmental variables. Using UK Biobank data, we developed a multiancestry PGS and calculated it for participants.Results: We found 76 significant associations with type 2 diabetes, including novel associations of asbestos and coal dust exposure. OCS, PXS, and PGS were significantly associated with type 2 diabetes. PXS had moderate power to determine associations, with larger effect size and greater power and reclassification improvement than PGS. For all scores, the results differed by race.Conclusions: Our findings in a multiancestry cohort elucidate how type 2 diabetes odds can be attributed to clinical, genetic, and environmental factors and emphasize the need for exposome data in disease-risk association studies. Race-based differences in predictive scores highlight the need for genetic and exposome-wide studies in diverse populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]