부산대학교 도서관

Objectives To compare the response to ritonavir (RTV) plus saquinavir (SQV) with single protease inhibitor (PI) therapies among PI-naive HIV-1 infected individuals. Methods Response to treatment was analysed according to the intent-to-treat principle in a prospective observational cohort study of 177 patients who between May 1995 and March 2000 started a double PI therapy with RTV and SQV (nonboosting dosages) plus at least one nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) and 2214 patients with a single PI therapy plus two NRTIs. We used survival analysis and Cox's proportional hazard regression methods. The primary endpoint was the time to a plasma viral load of < 400 copies/mL. Secondary endpoints were taken as a gain in the CD4 count of >100 cells/μL, and change of initial PI for any reason. Results Baseline characteristics in both treatment groups were balanced. Median follow-up in both groups was 10.4 months. Time to an HIV-1 viral load of < 400 copies/mL and an increase in the CD4 count of >100 × 106 cells/L was shorter for RTV plus SQV compared with single PI regimens (log rank test for each endpoint P < 0.05). The adjusted hazard ratios of RTV plus SQV compared with single PI regimens were 1.21 (95% confidence interval 0.99–1.47) for achieving an HIV-1 viral load of < 400 copies/mL, 1.12 (0.88–1.42) for an increase in the CD4 count of > 100 cells/μL, and 0.90 (0.73–1.11) for change of first PI regimen. Conclusions Treatment with RTV plus SQV compared with single PI regimens appeared to give similar results for virological or immunological response. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]