학술논문

Patient and healthcare professionals' perceptions of a combined blood and faecal immunochemical test for excluding colorectal cancer diagnosis in primary care.
Document Type
Article
Source
Health Expectations. Dec2023, Vol. 26 Issue 6, p2655-2665. 11p.
Subject
*BLOOD testing
*FECAL analysis
*IMMUNOCHEMISTRY
*PILOT projects
*COLONOSCOPY
*PATIENT participation
*ATTITUDES of medical personnel
*RESEARCH methodology
*EARLY detection of cancer
*INTERVIEWING
*MEDICAL care costs
*PATIENTS' attitudes
*COLORECTAL cancer
*PRIMARY health care
*RESEARCH funding
*SECONDARY care (Medicine)
*JUDGMENT sampling
*THEMATIC analysis
*SENSITIVITY & specificity (Statistics)
*TRUST
*EARLY diagnosis
Language
ISSN
1369-6513
Abstract
Objectives: To explore the perceptions of patients and healthcare professionals on Raman‐faecal immunochemical test (FIT) as an alternative test for colorectal cancer exclusion in primary care. Design: Semi‐structured interviews within a feasibility study. Setting: Patients presenting to primary care with colorectal symptoms and healthcare professionals working in primary and secondary care. Participants: A total of 23 patients and 12 healthcare professionals. Methods: Patient participants were asked to complete a novel combined Raman‐FIT test before being seen in secondary care. This study sought their opinions about the test. We also sought the views of healthcare professionals. Findings: Patients and healthcare professionals agreed that Raman‐FIT was a suitable test to be given in primary care. It aligned with routine practice and was a simple test for most patients to complete. Conclusions: Patients are willing and able to complete the Raman‐FIT test in primary care. Raman‐FIT may accelerate access to diagnosis with the potential to improve cancer outcomes. Patient and Public Involvement: Lay members (J. H. and I. H.) with experience and knowledge of colorectal cancer and screening contributed to developing, undertaking, and disseminating all aspects of the research. They were supported to collaborate as equal members of the research team. They were involved in developing the study as coapplicants, using personal experience to ensure that the research and its methods were relevant to the patient and public needs. Both prepared participant information sheets, coanalysed data, and contributed to study reporting and dissemination through papers, conference presentations and a lay summary. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]