학술논문
Evaluation of self-administered antigen testing in a college setting.
Document Type
Article
Author
Tinker, Sarah C.; Prince-Guerra, Jessica L.; Vermandere, Kelly; Gettings, Jenna; Drenzik, Cherie; Voccio, Gary; Parrott, Tonia; Drobeniuc, Jan; Hayden, Tonya; Briggs, Stephen; Heida, Debbie; Thornburg, Natalie; Barrios, Lisa C.; Neatherlin, John C.; Madni, Sabrina; Rasberry, Catherine N.; Swanson, Kenneth D.; Tamin, Azaibi; Harcourt, Jennifer L.; Lester, Sandra
Source
Subject
*ANTIGEN analysis
*UNIVERSITIES & colleges
*COVID-19
*BLOOD group antigens
*FATIGUE testing machines
*
*
*
*
Language
ISSN
1743-422X
Abstract
Background: The objective of our investigation was to better understand barriers to implementation of self-administered antigen screening testing for SARS-CoV-2 at institutions of higher education (IHE). Methods: Using the Quidel QuickVue At-Home COVID-19 Test, 1347 IHE students and staff were asked to test twice weekly for seven weeks. We assessed seroconversion using baseline and endline serum specimens. Online surveys assessed acceptability. Results: Participants reported 9971 self-administered antigen test results. Among participants who were not antibody positive at baseline, the median number of tests reported was eight. Among 324 participants seronegative at baseline, with endline antibody results and ≥ 1 self-administered antigen test results, there were five COVID-19 infections; only one was detected by self-administered antigen test (sensitivity = 20%). Acceptability of self-administered antigen tests was high. Conclusions: Twice-weekly serial self-administered antigen testing in a low prevalence period had low utility in this investigation. Issues of testing fatigue will be important to address in future testing strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]