학술논문
Identifying Patients in Need of Goals of Care Conversations: Reliability, Acceptability, and Prognostic Significance of the Preference-Aligned Communication and Treatment Conversation Trigger Tool for Patients with Cancer.
Document Type
Article
Source
Subject
*EXPERIMENTAL design
*HOSPITAL patients
*RESEARCH methodology
*CONVERSATION
*DO-not-resuscitate orders
*CANCER patients
*QUALITY assurance
*HOSPITAL wards
*DESCRIPTIVE statistics
*TUMORS
*GOAL (Psychology)
*PALLIATIVE treatment
*MEDICAL needs assessment
*ONCOLOGY
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Language
ISSN
1096-6218
Abstract
Background: Simple methods to help teams identify patients with goals of care (GOC) conversation needs are lacking. Objectives: To develop a tool to identify hospitalized patients who may benefit from GOC conversations. Methods: The Preference-Aligned Communication and Treatment (PACT) Conversation Trigger Tool was implemented as part of a quality improvement initiative in 10 Illinois hospitals and validated in a cohort of patients admitted to the coordinating site's oncology unit (n = 135). Results: The tool was reliable and acceptable to clinicians using it across sites. Thirty percent (n = 40) of patients screened at the coordinating site's oncology unit triggered positive. These patients were more likely to have a do-not-resuscitate order (43% vs. 11%) and palliative care consult (53% vs. 20%) and had lower mean survival time (125 vs. 248 days) than those who did not trigger (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The tool is reliable, acceptable, and can identify hospitalized oncology patients who may benefit from GOC conversations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]