부산대학교 도서관

Simple Summary: Glioblastoma is the most prevalent intracranial tumor in adults, and simultaneously the most aggressive. Surgical resection constitutes the initial step in the therapeutic approach, and is also highly significant, as studies have demonstrated that overall survival is markedly influenced by the extent of resection or residual tumor volume. Over the past few decades, various techniques for preoperative planning and intraoperative functional monitoring have been introduced to enhance the extent of resection, particularly in the case of functionally eloquent tumors. In this study, we conducted a monocentric investigation into the impact of various intraoperative surgical techniques within the realm of neurophysiological monitoring and mapping, introduced sequentially, on the overall survival of glioblastoma patients. In our cohort of 631 patients, each technique described did not exhibit a significant influence on overall survival. BACKGROUND: The resection of brain tumors can be critical concerning localization, but is a key point in treating gliomas. Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM), awake craniotomy, and mapping procedures have been incorporated over the years. Using these intraoperative techniques, the resection of eloquent-area tumors without increasing postoperative morbidity became possible. This study aims to analyze short-term and particularly long-term outcomes in patients diagnosed with high-grade glioma, who underwent surgical resection under various technical intraoperative settings over 14 years. METHODS: A total of 1010 patients with high-grade glioma that underwent resection between 2004 and 2018 under different monitoring or mapping procedures were screened; 631 were considered eligible for further analyses. We analyzed the type of surgery (resection vs. biopsy) and type of IONM or mapping procedures that were performed. Furthermore, the impact on short-term (The National Institute of Health Stroke Scale, NIHSS; Karnofsky Performance Scale, KPS) and long-term (progression-free survival, PFS; overall survival, OS) outcomes was analyzed. Additionally, the localization, extent of resection (EOR), residual tumor volume (RTV), IDH status, and adjuvant therapy were approached. RESULTS: In 481 patients, surgery, and in 150, biopsies were performed. The number of biopsies decreased significantly with the incorporation of awake surgeries with bipolar stimulation, IONM, and/or monopolar mapping (p < 0.001). PFS and OS were not significantly influenced by any intraoperative technical setting. EOR and RTV achieved under different operative techniques showed no statistical significance (p = 0.404 EOR, p = 0.186 RTV). CONCLUSION: Based on the present analysis using data from 14 years and more than 600 patients, we observed that through the implementation of various monitoring and mapping techniques, a significant decrease in biopsies and an increase in the resection of eloquent tumors was achieved. With that, the operability of eloquent tumors without a negative influence on neurological outcomes is suggested by our data. However, a statistical effect of monitoring and mapping procedures on long-term outcomes such as PFS and OS could not be shown. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]