학술논문

Pseudo computed tomography image generation from brain magnetic resonance image using integration of PCA & DCNN-UNET: A comparative analysis.
Document Type
Article
Source
Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems. 2022, Vol. 43 Issue 3, p3021-3037. 17p.
Subject
*MAGNETIC resonance imaging
*COMPUTED tomography
*ARTIFICIAL neural networks
*CONVOLUTIONAL neural networks
*INDEPENDENT component analysis
*TISSUES
Language
ISSN
1064-1246
Abstract
MRI-Only Radiation (RT) now avoids some of the issues associated with employing Computed Tomography(CT) in RT chains, such as MRI registration to a separate CT, excess dosage administration, and the cost of recurrent imaging. The fact that MRI signal intensities are unrelated to the biological tissue's attenuation coefficient poses a problem. This raises workloads, creates uncertainty as a result of the required inter-modality image registrations, and exposes patients to needless radiation. While using only MRI would be preferable, a method for estimating a pseudo-CT (pCT)or synthetic-CT(sCT) for producing electron density maps and patient positioning reference images is required. As Deep Learning(DL) is revolutionized in so many fields these days, an effective and accurate model is required for generating pCT from MRI. So, this paper depicts an efficient DL model in which the following are the stages: a) Data Acquisition where CT and MRI images are collected b) preprocessing these to avoid the anomalies and noises using techniques like outlier elimination, data smoothening and data normalizing c) feature extraction and selection using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) & regression method d) generating pCT from MRI using Deep Convolutional Neural Network and UNET (DCNN-UNET). We here compare both feature extraction (PCA) and classification model (DCNN-UNET) with other methods such as Discrete Wavelet Tranform(DWT), Independent Component Analysis(ICA), Fourier Transform and VGG16, ResNet, AlexNet, DenseNet, CNN (Convolutional Neural Network)respectively. The performance measures used to evaluate these models are Dice Coefficient(DC), Structured Similarity Index Measure(SSIM), Mean Absolute Error(MAE), Mean Squared Error(MSE), Accuracy, Computation Time in which our proposed system outperforms better with 0.94±0.02 over other state-of-art models. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]