학술논문

Weighing the costs: Implementing the SLMTA programme in Zimbabwe using internal versus external facilitators.
Document Type
Article
Source
African Journal of Laboratory Medicine. 2014, Vol. 3 Issue 2, p1-6. 6p.
Subject
*LABORATORY management
*MEDICAL care costs
*PUBLIC health laboratories
Language
ISSN
2225-2002
Abstract
Background: In 2010, the Zimbabwe Ministry of Health and Child Welfare (MoHCW) adopted the Strengthening Laboratory Management Toward Accreditation (SLMTA) programme as a tool for laboratory quality systems strengthening. Objectives: To evaluate the financial costs of SLMTA implementation using two models (external facilitators; and internal local or MoHCW facilitators) from the perspective of the implementing partner and to estimate resources needed to scale up the programme nationally in all 10 provinces. Methods: The average expenditure per laboratory was calculated based on accounting records; calculations included implementing partner expenses but excluded in-kind contributions and salaries of local facilitators and trainees. We also estimated theoretical financial costs, keeping all contextual variables constant across the two models. Resource needs for future national expansion were estimated based on a two-phase implementation plan, in which 12 laboratories in each of five provinces would implement SLMTA per phase; for the internal facilitator model, 20 facilitators would be trained at the beginning of each phase. Results: The average expenditure to implement SLMTA in 11 laboratories using external facilitators was approximately US$5800 per laboratory; expenditure in 19 laboratories using internal facilitators was approximately $6000 per laboratory. The theoretical financial cost of implementing a 12-laboratory SLMTA cohort keeping all contextual variables constant would be approximately $58000 using external facilitators; or $15000 using internal facilitators, plus $86000 to train 20 facilitators. The financial cost for subsequent SLMTA cohorts using the previously-trained internal facilitators would be approximately $15000, yielding a breakeven point of 2 cohorts, at $116000 for either model. Estimated resources required for national implementation in 120 laboratories would therefore be $580000 using external facilitators ($58000 per province) and $322000 using internal facilitators ($86000 for facilitator training in each of two phases plus $15000 for SLMTA implementation in each province). Conclusion: Investing in training of internal facilitators will result in substantial savings over the scale-up of the programme. Our study provides information to assist policy makers to develop strategic plans for investing in laboratory strengthening. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]