부산대학교 도서관

Background: Traditionally, implantation of the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S‐ICD) requires incisions near the lateral chest wall, the xyphoid, and the superior sternal region (three‐incision technique [3IT]). A two‐incision technique (2IT) avoids the superior incision and has been shown to be a viable alternative in small studies with limited follow‐up. Objectives: To report on the long‐term safety and efficacy of the 2IT compared to the 3IT procedure in a large patient cohort. Methods: Patients enrolled in the S‐ICD post approval study (PAS) were stratified by procedural technique (2IT vs. 3IT). Baseline demographics, comorbidities and procedural outcomes were collected. Complications and S‐ICD effectiveness in treating ventricular arrhythmias through an average 3‐year follow‐up period were compared. Results: Of 1637 patients enrolled in the S‐ICD PAS, 854 pts (52.2%) were implanted using the 2IT and 782 were implanted using the 3IT (47.8%). The 2IT became more prevalent over time, increasing from 40% to 69% of implants (Q1–Q4). Mean procedure time was shorter with 2IT (69.0 vs. 86.3 min, p <.0001). No other differences in outcomes were observed between the two groups, including rates of infection, electrode migration, inappropriate shocks and first shock efficacy for treating ventricular arrhythmias. Conclusion: In this large cohort of patients implanted with an S‐ICD and followed for 3 years the 2IT was as safe and effective as the 3IT while significantly reducing procedure time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]