부산대학교 도서관

Background: There is scarce information on the prognostic role of frailty and atrial fibrillation (AF) in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Methods: The aim was to analyse the management of elderly patients with frailty and AF who suffered an ACS using data of the prospective multicentre LONGEVOSCA registry. We evaluated the predictive performance of FRAIL, Charlson scores and AF status for adverse events at 6- month follow- up. Results: A total of 531 unselected patients with ACS and above 80 years old [mean age 84.4 (SD = 3.6) years; 322 (60.6%) male] were enrolled, of whom 128 (24.1%) with AF and 145 (27.3%) with frailty. Mutually exclusive number of patients were as follows: non- frail and sinus rhythm (SR) 304 (57.2%); frail and SR 99 (18.6%); nonfrail and AF 82 (15.4%); and frail and AF 46 (8.7%). Frail and AF patients compared with non- frail and SR patients had higher risk of all- cause mortality [HR 2.61, (95% CI 1.28- 5.31; P = .008)], readmissions [HR 2.28, (95%CI 1.37- 3.80); P = .002)] and its composite [HR 2.28, (95% CI 1.44- 3.60); P < .001)]. After multivariate adjustment, FRAIL score [HR 1.41, (95% CI 1.02- 1.97); P = .040] and Charlson index [HR 1.32, (95% CI 1.09- 1.59); P = .003] were significantly associated with mortality. AF status was not independently related with adverse events. Conclusions: Frailty but not AF status was independently associated with follow- up adverse events. Frailty status and high Charlson index were independent conditions associated with adverse events during the follow- up. The impact of functional status has a bigger prognostic role over AF status in elderly patients with ACS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]