학술논문

LMA Gastro™ airway is feasible during upper gastrointestinal interventional endoscopic procedures in high risk patients: a single-center observational study.
Document Type
Article
Source
BMC Anesthesiology. 2/8/2020, Vol. 20 Issue 1, p1-7. 7p.
Subject
*AIRWAY (Anatomy)
*ANESTHESIOLOGISTS
*CRITICALLY ill
*ENDOSCOPIC retrograde cholangiopancreatography
*GASTROSTOMY
*HEALTH status indicators
*SCIENTIFIC observation
*PATIENTS
*PYLORUS
*SURGICAL stents
*TREATMENT effectiveness
*RETROSPECTIVE studies
*POSITIVE pressure ventilation
*SURGICAL site
*ENDOSCOPIC gastrointestinal surgery
*GENERAL anesthesia
Language
ISSN
1471-2253
Abstract
Background: Nonoperating room anesthesia during gastroenterological procedures is a growing field in anesthetic practice. While the numbers of patients with severe comorbidities are rising constantly, gastrointestinal endoscopic interventions are moving closer to minimally invasive endoscopic surgery. The LMA Gastro™ is a new supraglottic airway device, developed specifically for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and interventions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of LMA Gastro™ in patients with ASA physical status ≥3 undergoing advanced endoscopic procedures. Methods: We analyzed data from 214 patients retrospectively who received anesthesia for gastroenterological interventions. Inclusion criteria were upper gastrointestinal endoscopic interventions, airway management with LMA Gastro™ and ASA status ≥3. The primary outcome measure was successful use of LMA Gastro™ for airway management and endoscopic intervention. Results: Thirtyone patients with ASA physical status ≥3, undergoing complex and prolonged upper gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures were included. There were 7 endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographies, 7 peroral endoscopic myotomies, 5 percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomies and 12 other complex procedures (e.g. endoscopic submucosal dissection, esophageal stent placement etc.). Of these, 27 patients were managed successfully using the LMA Gastro™. Placement of the LMA Gastro™ was reported as easy. Positive pressure ventilation was performed without difficulty. The feasibility of the LMA Gastro™ for endoscopic intervention was rated excellent by the endoscopists. In four patients, placement or ventilation with LMA Gastro™ was not possible. Conclusions: We demonstrated the feasibility of the LMA Gastro™ during general anesthesia for advanced endoscopic procedures in high-risk patients. Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00017396) Date of registration: 23rd May 2019, retrospectively registered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]