학술논문

Community-acquired respiratory viruses and co-infection among patients of Ontario sentinel practices, April 2009 to February 2010.
Document Type
Article
Source
Influenza & Other Respiratory Viruses. Jul2013, Vol. 7 Issue 4, p559-566. 8p. 1 Diagram, 5 Charts, 3 Graphs.
Subject
*COMMUNITY-acquired infections
*AGE factors in disease
*H1N1 influenza
*CASE-control method
*LOGISTIC regression analysis
SEX differences (Biology)
Language
ISSN
1750-2640
Abstract
Please cite this paper as: Peci et al. (2012) Community-acquired respiratory viruses and co-infection among patients of Ontario Sentinel practices, April 2009 to February 2010. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses 7(4), 559-566. Background Respiratory viruses are known to cocirculate but this has not been described in detail during an influenza pandemic. Objectives To describe respiratory viruses, including co-infection and associated attributes such as age, sex or comorbidity, in patients presenting with influenza-like illness to a community sentinel network, during the pandemic A(H1N1)pdm09 in Ontario, Canada. Methods Respiratory samples and epidemiologic details were collected from 1018 patients with influenza-like illness as part of respiratory virus surveillance and a multiprovincial case-control study of influenza vaccine effectiveness. Results At least one virus was detected in 668 (65·6%) of 1018 samples; 512 (50·3%) had single infections and 156 (15·3%) co-infections. Of single infections, the most common viruses were influenza A in 304 (59·4%) samples of which 275 (90·5%) were influenza A(H1N1)pdm09, and enterovirus/rhinovirus in 149 (29·1%) samples. The most common co-infections were influenza A and respiratory syncytial virus B, and influenza A and enterovirus/rhinovirus. In multinomial logistic regression analyses adjusted for age, sex, comorbidity, and timeliness of sample collection, single infection was less often detected in the elderly and co-infection more often in patients <30 years of age. Co-infection, but not single infection, was more likely detected in patients who had a sample collected within 2 days of symptom onset as compared to 3-7 days. Conclusions Respiratory viral co-infections are commonly detected when using molecular techniques. Early sample collection increases likelihood of detection of co-infection. Further studies are needed to better understand the clinical significance of viral co-infection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]