학술논문

Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Usage Has Leveled Out From 2010 to 2021.
Document Type
Article
Source
Spine (03622436). 10/15/2023, Vol. 48 Issue 20, pE342-E348. 7p.
Subject
*INTERVERTEBRAL disk
*ARTHROPLASTY
*CERVICAL vertebrae
*SPINAL surgery
*ORTHOPEDISTS
Language
ISSN
0362-2436
Abstract
Study Design. Descriptive epidemiologic study. Objective. To compare trends in utilization and predictive factors for single-level cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) relative to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) over the years. Background. CDA is an alternative to ACDF for the treatment of cervical spine pathologies. With both procedures performed for similar indications, controversy on best practices exists. Materials and Methods. Patients who underwent single-level CDA or ACDF were identified in the 2010 through 2021 Pearl- Diver M151Ortho data set. The yearly number of CDAs performed and proportionality was assessed. Predictive patient factors for undergoing CDA as opposed to ACDF were determined. Kaplan Meyer survival analysis with an endpoint of cervical spine reoperation compared 5-year outcomes between CDA and ACDF. Results. From 2010 to 2021, 19,301 single-level CDAs and 181,476 single-level ACDFs were identified. The proportional utilization of CDA relative to ACDF increased from 4.00% in 2010 to 14.15% in 2018 (P < 0.0001), after which there was a plateau between 2018 and 2021 where proportional utilization was 14.47% (P = 0.4654). Multivariate analysis identified several predictors of undergoing CDA rather than ACDF, including: younger age [odds ratio (OR) per decade decrease: 1.72], having surgery performed in the Midwest, Northeast, or West (relative to South, OR: 1.16, 1.13, 2.26, respectively), having Commercial insurance (relative to Medicare, OR: 1.75), and having surgery performed by an orthopedic surgeon (relative to a neurological surgeon, OR: 1.54) (P < 0.0001 for each). There was no statistically significant difference in 5-year survival to further cervical spine surgery between CDA and ACDF at 5 years (97.6% vs. 97.7%, P = 0.4249). Conclusions. Although the use of CDA relative to ACDF rose from 2010 to 2018, its use has subsequently plateaued between 2018 and 2021 and remained a relatively low percentage of the single-level anterior cervical surgeries performed (14.47% in 2021). The causes for such changes in the trend are unclear. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]