학술논문
Developing and exploring the validity of a patient reported experience measure for adult inpatient diabetes care.
Document Type
Article
Author
Source
Subject
*TREATMENT of diabetes
*RESEARCH funding
*ACADEMIC medical centers
*RESEARCH methodology evaluation
*HOSPITAL care
*QUESTIONNAIRES
*INTERVIEWING
*EXPERIMENTAL design
*THEMATIC analysis
*PATIENT-centered care
*RESEARCH methodology
*HEALTH outcome assessment
*EVALUATION
*ADULTS
RESEARCH evaluation
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Language
ISSN
0742-3071
Abstract
Aim: To develop and explore the validity of a Patient Reported Experience Measure (PREM) for adult inpatient diabetes care. Method: 27 in‐depth interviews were conducted to inform the development of the 42‐item PREM which was cognitively tested with 10 people. A refined 38‐item PREM was piloted with 228 respondents completing a paper (n = 198) or online (n = 30) version. The performance of the PREM was evaluated by exploring (i) uptake/number of responses and (ii) survey validity by investigating whether the PREM data were of adequate quality and delivered useful information. Results: The PREM had low drop‐out or missing data rates suggesting it was appropriately constructed. Analysis of item frequencies and variances, and problem score calculations concluded that questions provided sufficient score differentiation. Conclusions: This new PREM allows for experiences of inpatient diabetes care to be measured, understood and reported on to help identify priority areas for improving care quality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]