학술논문

Increased lesion detectability in patients with locally advanced breast cancer—A pilot study using dynamic whole-body [18F]FDG PET/CT.
Document Type
Article
Source
EJNMMI Research. 3/25/2024, Vol. 14 Issue 1, p1-10. 10p.
Subject
*CANCER patients
*MAGNETIC resonance mammography
*SENTINEL lymph node biopsy
*METASTATIC breast cancer
*POSITRON emission tomography
*COMPUTED tomography
Language
ISSN
2191-219X
Abstract
Background: Accurate diagnosis of axillary lymph node (ALN) metastases is essential for prognosis and treatment planning in breast cancer. Evaluation of ALN is done by ultrasound, which is limited by inter-operator variability, and by sentinel lymph node biopsy and/or ALN dissection, none of which are without risks and/or long-term complications. It is known that conventional 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose ([18F]FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has limited sensitivity for ALN metastases. However, a recently developed dynamic whole-body (D-WB) [18F]FDG PET/CT scanning protocol, allowing for imaging of tissue [18F]FDG metabolic rate (MRFDG), has been shown to have the potential to increase lesion detectability. The study purpose was to examine detectability of malignant lesions in D-WB [18F]FDG PET/CT compared to conventional [18F]FDG PET/CT. Results: This study prospectively included ten women with locally advanced breast cancer who were referred for an [18F]FDG PET/CT as part of their diagnostic work-up. They all underwent D-WB [18F]FDG PET/CT, consisting of a 6 min single bed dynamic scan over the chest region started at the time of tracer injection, a 64 min dynamic WB PET scan consisting of 16 continuous bed motion passes, and finally a contrast-enhanced CT scan, with generation of MRFDG parametric images. Lesion visibility was assessed by tumor-to-background and contrast-to-noise ratios using volumes of interest isocontouring tumors with a set limit of 50% of SUVmax and background volumes placed in the vicinity of tumors. Lesion visibility was best in the MRFDG images, with target-to-background values 2.28 (95% CI: 2.04–2.54) times higher than target-to-background values in SUV images, and contrast-to-noise values 1.23 (95% CI: 1.12–1.35) times higher than contrast-to-noise values in SUV images. Furthermore, five imaging experts visually assessed the images and three additional suspicious lesions were found in the MRFDG images compared to SUV images; one suspicious ALN, one suspicious parasternal lymph node, and one suspicious lesion located in the pelvic bone. Conclusions: D-WB [18F]FDG PET/CT with MRFDG images show potential for improved lesion detectability compared to conventional SUV images in locally advanced breast cancer. Further validation in larger cohorts is needed. Clinical trial registration: The trial is registered in clinicaltrials.gov, NCT05110443, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05110443?term=NCT05110443&rank=1. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]