학술논문

A Questionable Indication For ICD Extraction After Successful VT Ablation.
Document Type
Article
Source
JAFIB: Journal of Atrial Fibrillation. Apr/May2015, Vol. 7 Issue 6, p53-61. 9p.
Subject
*VENTRICULAR tachycardia
*IMPLANTABLE cardioverter-defibrillators
*VENTRICULAR arrhythmia
*THERAPEUTICS
Language
ISSN
1941-6911
Abstract
Sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias represent a kind of complication shared by a number of clinical presentations of heart disease, sometimes leading to sudden cardiac death. Many efforts have been made in the fight against such a complication, mainly being represented by the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). In recent years, catheter ablation has grown as a means to effectively treat patients with sustained ventricular arrhythmias, in the contest of different cardiac substrates. Since carrying an ICD is associated with a potential risk deriving from its possible infective or malfunctioning complications, and given the current effectiveness of lead extraction procedures, it has been thought not to be unreasonable to ask ourselves about how to deal with ICD patients who have been successfully treated by means of ablation of their ventricular arrhythmias. To date, no control data have been published on transvenous lead extraction in the setting of VT ablation. In this paper we will review the current evidence about ICD therapy, catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias and lead extraction, trying to outline some considerations about how to face this new clinical issue. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]