부산대학교 도서관

PURPOSE: Evaluation of PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) by pathologists has been very impactful but is limited by factors such as intraobserver/interobserver bias and intratumor heterogeneity. We developed an artificial intelligence (AI)–powered analyzer to assess TPS for the prediction of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) response in advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The AI analyzer was trained with 393,565 tumor cells annotated by board-certified pathologists for PD-L1 expression in 802 whole-slide images (WSIs) stained by 22C3 pharmDx immunohistochemistry. The clinical performance of the analyzer was validated in an external cohort of 430 WSIs from patients with NSCLC. Three pathologists performed annotations of this external cohort, and their consensus TPS was compared with AI-based TPS. RESULTS: In comparing PD-L1 TPS assessed by AI analyzer and by pathologists, a significant positive correlation was observed (Spearman coefficient = 0.925; P <.001). The concordance of TPS between AI analyzer and pathologists according to TPS ≥50%, 1%-49%, and <1% was 85.7%, 89.3%, and 52.4%, respectively. In median progression-free survival (PFS), AI-based TPS predicted prognosis in the TPS 1%-49% or TPS <1% group better than the pathologist's reading, with the TPS ≥50% group as a reference (hazard ratio [HR], 1.49 [95% CI, 1.19 to 1.86] v HR, 1.36 [95% CI, 1.08 to 1.71] for TPS 1%-49% group, and HR, 2.38 [95% CI, 1.69 to 3.35] v HR, 1.62 [95% CI, 1.23 to 2.13] for TPS <1% group). CONCLUSION: PD-L1 TPS assessed by AI analyzer correlates with that of pathologists, with clinical performance also being comparable when referenced to PFS. The AI model can accurately predict tumor response and PFS of ICI in advanced NSCLC via assessment of PD-L1 TPS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]