학술논문

The global temperature-related mortality impact of earlier decarbonization for the Australian health sector and economy: A modelling study.
Document Type
Article
Source
PLoS ONE. 8/3/2022, Vol. 17 Issue 8, p1-10. 10p.
Subject
*BASELINE emissions
*CLIMATE change & health
*CARBON dioxide mitigation
*EMISSIONS (Air pollution)
*GOVERNMENT policy on climate change
*MOSQUITO nets
*MEDICAL communication
Language
ISSN
1932-6203
Abstract
Background: Sustained elevated concentration of GHGs is predicted to increase global mortality. With the Australian health sector responsible for 7% of the nation's GHG emissions, the benefits and costs of various decarbonisation trajectories are currently being investigated. To assist with this effort, we model the impact earlier decarbonisation has on temperature-related mortality. Design: We used DICE-EMR, an Integrated Assessment Model with an endogenous mortality response, to simulate Australian GHG trajectories and estimate the temperature-related mortality impact of early decarbonisation. We modelled a linear decline of the Australian health sector's and economy's GHG annual emissions to net-zero targets of 2040 and 2050. Main outcome measure: Deaths averted and monetary-equivalent welfare gain. Results: Decarbonisation of the Australian health sector by 2050 and 2040 is projected to avert an estimated 69,000 and 77,000 global temperature-related deaths respectively in a Baseline global emissions scenario. Australian economy decarbonisation by 2050 and 2040 is projected to avert an estimated 988,000 and 1,101,000 global deaths respectively. Assuming a low discount rate and high global emissions trajectory, we estimate a monetary equivalent welfare gain of $151 billion if the Australian health sector decarbonises by 2040, only accounting for the benefits in reducing temperature-related mortality. Conclusions: Earlier decarbonisation has a significant impact on temperature-related mortality. Many uncertainties exist and health impacts other than temperature-related mortality are not captured by this analysis. Nevertheless, such models can help communicate the health risk of climate change and improve climate policy decision making. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]